Hi,

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Przemyslaw Czerpak <dru...@acn.waw.pl> wrote:
> ps. I think that you should discuss such modifications with xHarbour
>    developers before commit. Harbour uses different logic for timestamp
>    items. It has different arithmetic and relational operators behavior
>    in HVM and native RDDs were updated to respect it. You ported to xHarbour
>    only RDD part what is technical nonsense because now the RDD results of
>    some operations like seek or scope positioning can give incompatible to
>    HVM results, f.e. this code can show "corrupted index" for ascending
>    index on timestamp value:
>         seek( dDate )
>         if ordKeyVal() < dDate
>            ? "corrupted index"
>         endif
>    If you want to introduce it to xHarbour then you should 1-st agree
>    the behavior in the whole code and modifications in HVM/RTL. Probably
>    you will need Walter help here.

I propose to tag CVS _before_ that commit as 1.2.2 and make a quick release.

-- Ph.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports &#45; New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
royalty&#45;free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
xHarbour-developers mailing list
xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers

Reply via email to