Pre.S. ADSX is not xHarbour related, but this message shows the value of ADS* in comparison to pure ADS. So, I putt CC xHarbour also.
Hi, Przemysław Czerpak wrote: >> The addition of specific "sub-rdds" of ADSCDX etc. came years later. >> I, and I imagine a lot of other people who started using rddads >> early on, never had a need to explicitly use those other rdds by name. > > Any one who has code like: > > proc copy_table( cSrc, cSrcRDD, cDst, cDstRDD ) > use (cSrc) via (cSrcRDD) > copy to (cDst) via (cDstRDD) > return > > designed to work with different RDDs in Clipper, needs ADS* RDDs to port > his code without introducing unnecessary and incompatible with other RDDs > modifications which are necessary to make working code like: > copy_table( "sales", "ADSCDX", "sales2", "ADSADT" ) > ... 2 minutes ago my co-worker asked a related RDD name question. Until know we've used ADSX RDD whitch is inherited from ADS. We are moving from ADSCDX to ADSADT, but of some transition time we need both ADSADT and ADSCDX with ADSX functionality. Since ADSX is the only RDD with local indexing capability AdsSetFileType() does not help any more to specify database/index type, because we need both. The only solution I see is to make 4 RDDs instead of one ADSX. That names do you prefer: 1) ADSXCDX, ADSXADT, ADSXNTX, ADSXVFP 2) ADSCDXX, ADSADTX, ADSNTXX, ADSVFPX Regards, Mindaugas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
