On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 21:16:58 +0200 Kjetil Thuen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's kind of embarrassing, but I didn't know about the access() call. I > have fixed this bug and a couple of others like it in cvs now. xmame > executables without the readable bit set are no longer a problem. > Thanks for the tip. Is that the reason for this (quote from web page): It leaks 152 bytes on startup. I cannot figure out why. _______________________________________________ Xmame mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
