> The acronym "XUL" does indeed _stand_ for "Xml User > interface Language". > > But it only refers to Mozilla's language, it's not a > generic term. (The acronym is rather convoluted.) > This is what I meant > when I wrote the > above, and is what I have been saying since Gerald > started his "project". > > The generic term for XML-based User Interface > Languages would be XUILs. Why not XUI or XMLUI? Please, Ian grow up.
For some more insight check out the latest Web Standard Project story titled "Gooey Standards" online @ http://webstandards.org/buzz/archive/2003_10.html#000239 Why not count the usage of XUL and report back? - Gerald ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ xul-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
