> Martin Bochnig wrote: > > The current X11-group's patch breks autoconfigure functionality, when no > xorg.conf file is present. But it is of course ARC-verified ... > > ARC doesn't verify anything, it just reviews proposals to make > sure they don't conflict with other projects and existing policies. > Nothing says what I did in the autoconfig patch is right, just > that the idea made sense and it seemed to work in testing with > the two drivers we had to test with. There's also nothing saying > there's no better way to do it, or that we won't change it in the > future if someone does have a better way to do it. > > -- > -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com > Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
I didn't say that I have the better solution, either. I just brought it to light again and indicated, that I would like to work out the best solution for this, in a community/team. In interaction with / mutually agreeing with you. ARC: Yes, it always makes things sound so "official". That's the only thing which I had been objecting to. It looks like so much paper work and can make things take long (even for small changes). But, I do admit it, without such a verification process we would not have _the_ Solaris which we all respect and like. rgds. %m
