Very correct Alex, there can be no better reason for the party to take 
disciplinary steps against any " Bolshevik" whose conduct is in line with this 
certain Tsembeyi person's last paragraph in his post ."the firm and 
uncomopromising stands"above the interest of the organisation is dangerous if 
not counter revolutionary and there is nothing neither Bolshevik and Menshevik 
about that.
 
Zico should have been suspended long time ago when he unconstitutionally 
suspended the Gauteng's District Chairpersons prior to the 12TH National 
Congress of the party for refusing to endorse his candidacy for the position of 
the General Secretary if you care to know, now that is not even a stalinism but 
a mere lumpenisms. 



Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Fw: The Menshevisation Of The PartyDate: Wed, 
10 Dec 2008 12:39:38 +0200From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 
[email protected]





The cowards who mask themselves behind pseudonyms in an operation to discredit 
decisions from the SACP Central Committee among others by way of trying to turn 
the YCL forum as a platform of expressing feelings rather than objective 
engagements are not only wasting their time and energy, they are also 
interrupting our schedules unnecessarily so.      
 
We shall also not be threatened by an adoption of revolutionary names to 
advance counter-revolutionary, anti-communist agendas. As Marxists-Leninists we 
relate to both persons and formations not from what they say of themselves, but 
from clarity between that and what they really are and do in practice. We are 
not obsessed with appearances. We pass over from appearance to essence in every 
name used, situation whatsoever.   
The writer below sounds to be having knowledge that her/his own activities are 
incompatible with the Party principles. Her/His stories written bellow are 
evidence that s/he must appear before the SACP Disciplinary process, which he 
avoids by using a pseudonym masquerading as a Bolshevik, WHICH S/HE IS CLEARLY 
NOT.   
Lastly, any comrades facing charges in the Party are presumed innocent, until 
found otherwise after a due, credible process. I’m certain that the Central 
Committee Disciplinary Committee has no reason in principle to refuse any 
person to give evidence for or against any charges on any accused appearing 
before it. BUT, SUCH WITNESSES MUST BREAK FROM COWARDICE, BE THEMSELVES AND USE 
THEIR REAL NAMES; THEY ARE FREE TO APPEAR ANYWHERE AS THEY REALLY ARE. That is 
part of the freedom of expression fought for by our Party which was banned in 
1950 under the Suppression of Communism Act. 
Truly,
Mashilo, Alex Mohubetswane 
 
 

---------- Forwarded message ----------From: sithembewena tsembeyi <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>Date: 2008/12/8Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Fw: The Menshevisation Of 
The PartyTo: 




--- On Mon, 12/8/08, sithembewena tsembeyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: sithembewena tsembeyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: The Menshevisation Of 
The PartyTo: "Dominic Tweedie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: Monday, December 8, 
2008, 4:56 AM






The resent suspension of Zico Bolshevik Tamela and other progressive caders of 
the party from the Bolshevik province of Gauteng is a clear indication 
intolerance and stalinisim within the party, We will not be surprised to see 
further suspension of other Bolshevik leaders in the province or the disbanding 
of Gauteng PEC, as Gauteng has always been the voice of reason with in the 
party.

 

Some within the CC are beholding grudges with cders, Especially those that 
ideologically pro founded them, Sometime last year in the ACC the then 
provincial Secretary of the Party Cader Vishwas Satgar was insulted and 
attacked in an uncommunist manner, to make matters worse those who insulted 
Cader Vish went to an extend of attiring racist remarks to the fallow comrade.

 

All these uncomradely attacks took  place took place in the presences of the 
GS, and entire CC, yet failed to protect the cader, Simply becoz it was 
advancing a ceirtain agenda of those who claim to be the representatives of the 
working class, Whilest in reality they are representing their personal 
interests.

 

The partys Central Commitee members seem to have forgoten, the fact that 
communist caders are the most advanced and resolute section of the working 
class, and tha they do not have an interest of their own separate from that of 
the working class. Suspending Bolsheviks caders like Ziko, Tengo, and the 
others sugests that the is a tendency or a move by those that are financially 
comfortable within the party to transform the SACP into a permanent socialst 
desk of the ANC.

  

These susupended Bolsheviks are possing as threat to the lumpent bourgoiesie 
that are curently possing as representatives of the working class, whilest they 
are pure capitalist at haert and agents of the impirialist agenda. Futher more 
these Bolsheviks are suspended for advancing a maxist leninist concept. A 
truely communist concept that seeks to advance working class agenda of over 
throwing the  bourgoie suprimacy. These Bolsheviks consistancy on the state 
power question is a thorn in ass of the  bourgoiesie and their consistancy 
irritates the  bourgoiesie, therefore the lumpent  bourgoiesie with in party 
who are also the drivers of pro-impirialist agenda decided to

 suspend these Bolshevik. The CC might succeed in destroying these classicall 
caders, as they are sinoir to other within the CC, but will have to note that 
the might of the working class has never been defeated. History will JUDGE 
those THUGS who are busy triying to destroy the communist party in a brutal 
way. If fighting for the dictatorship of the proletariat is a crime in the 
communist party I therefore on behalf of these BOLSHEVIKS  plead guilty as 
charged, 

 

As caders from the bolshevic province we are tampted to believe that this 
susupention of Cde Zico and the others was triggered by the firm and 
uncompromising stand of these true representatives of the working class.  

 

PATRIA O MUERTE!!

VENCEREMOS

 

--- On Fri, 12/5/08, Dominic Tweedie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

From: Dominic Tweedie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: RE: Gauteng on th right 
pathTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Friday, December 5, 2008, 12:18 AM


Dear Cde Sithembewena,
 
Zico's cronies got me suspended from the branch last year and wanted to chuck 
me out of the Party. 
  
The year before that, it was Vishwas Satgar who tried to have me thrown out. 
  
I have known Zico for many years. When he was suspended from SATAWU I did not 
shun him. Little did I know that he would try to work the same suspension 
business on me. 
  
When Dinga was reinstated by NUMSA, I rejoiced, even though Dinga had been 
Zico's chief prosecutor against me last year. 
  
This time it's different. These guys are accused of using their positions in 
the  Party to establish another party, just like Mluleki George and the others 
did in the ANC. 
  
The suspension is done by the CC. The disciplinary process will be done 
properly. You have to accept it, comrade, until the process is complete. 
  
My advice to you is: Do not lobby in this way for Zico and the others. Do not 
make allegations of ulterior motives the way you have done in this message to 
me.   
  
Allow the constitutional process to go through. 
  
With  best wishes, 
  
Dominic. 
  
  
  

From: sithembewena tsembeyi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 December 2008 
09:58 AMTo: Dominic TweedieSubject: Gauteng on th right path
  





Dominic I know over the years we have seen Gauteng being a victim of 
secumstances but we as the constitiance of this movement have to say it 
clearly, I know that we have seen it bileteraly that it was a plan of other 
fuctions that after the leadership of Ziko and Nkosi, they were not wanted, 
this says it clearly that some within the movement donot respect the democratic 
process of the party in the province, Ziko and Nkosi have done all its worth to 
keep the party alive in the province, yet they are being dealth with, We have 
seen Nkosi being a true communist, one that will stand for the libaration and 
betterness of the poor and the working class, is this not what the party stand 
for.

 

I know I might today been seen as a reactionary, but to the true esence of the 
matter we have no solid grounds to deal with the privincial leadership, infact 
we should be looking closely how to assist the province to do futher better for 
is people, I have not mailed you to cource conflict nor vistimisation of any of 
the leaders, the fact is you need to open up clearly so and see what damage you 
may course in dealing with these province, we have seen things unfolding and it 
is of true believe that non of any other province has performed to the idialogy 
of socialist than the Gauteng comministly so.

 

Ziko might have been suspended due to some inconcivety that I might not know, 
but for the fect that the provincial chair is been ploted against I find it 
desterbing for the party as a whole, and we can not say that one who has on 
open and indipenden view of the status core of the party must be dealth with in 
any case we have seen the best leader and preferably Jerremy can agree too.

 

Dominic I know you have been the greates writer of the communiist sociaty but 
know you need to over center the counter revolutionary that might be under way 
especially when it comes to dealing with Nkosiphendule the provincial Chair.

 

Hoping you will find this in order
 

-- MSEROBATSE_________________________________________________________________
Get the next generation of Free Windows Live Services
http://get.live.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] . You don't have to put anything 
in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the message part. 
All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address (repeat): [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to