Cde Skizo a lot has been said on this matter of the GS and deployment. 
Perhaps I must reaffirm that am not yet a Communist however I aspire to
be one not merely because of the scientific revolutionary theory but
primarily because my late mom was a farm worker and my state-pensioned
father was a garden boy.  
 
As a somebody who aspires to be a communist, I have learnt elsewhere
that the only thing that does not change is change itself.  In other
words, every thing existing is in motion.  Therefore, if conditions or a
space opens, communists must be able to cease it in order to advance the
working class struggle.  This means that your so-called supreme laws or
rather fixed laws is a foreign concept for any communist who knows what
he/she is talking about. Correct me if am wrong?
 
Beyond this, your selective reading of the constitution speaks volumes
than your attempt to "talk left, (whilst) walking right" support of the
GS.  You remind me of the 2006-2008 Sasco NEC that claimed to support JZ
by lambasting/ridiculing him in the media.  
 
Just please please read this extract and digest it before responding:
"The General Secretary shall be the leading National Office Bearer of
the SACP and afull-time officialunder conditions of service determined
by the CC."
 
Take some deep breath and count to at least 5, what do you make of the
"...full-time officialunder conditions of service determined by the
CC."?
 
For me, it literally means that the CC can decide whether to deploy him
or not while he remains the GS.  And this is what the CC did.  Just go
and research a statement made by the CC released early this year.
 
After doing that, you can than come back and tell us why your
self-professed support for GS made you to be ignorant of this basic fact
captured in the same clause that you dream has been violated.  
 
What authority makes you to think that the CC of the Party was wrong
and you are correct? Dont your think, this is a contradiction of your
self-declared support for the GS? by the way, am not even interested in
you answering this, but am just giving you food for thought so that you
do not take our reading time for a cheap ride.
 
Comrade Luthuli is normally quoted as having warned that "comrades do
not have to talk for the sake of talking because even if you do not
talk, you remain a comrade".
 
I pause.
 
T.S. Zondi
>>> Skizo Skizo <[email protected]> 11/12/2009 5:13 PM >f 
well raised  my  leader.

From: Mduduzi Herman Vilakazi <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Tue, November 10, 2009 9:06:48 AM
Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Blade 'safe from drunk dreamers', Buti
Manamela, Times

Et al,
 
Cde Domza, I understand why you debate this issue in this fashion. You
have the same suspicions I have about people who want to hijack the
platform to strengthen their case against the GS. I am also aware that
there are opportunists who want nothing but to annihilate the spirit of
unity within the party. I am equally aware that there are those who are
not comfortable with a communists receiving two salaries and believe
that they have a share in personal wealth of individuals.
 
I am aware that people attack leadership to so as to insult the
organisation they lead. I am aware that at all times discussions should
be informed not by forces of the economy but by operational material
conditions. I am made to understand that there are some political thugs
who are on standby to weaken progressive political organisations. All
these is but a manifestation of the cruelty of capitalism.
 
The angle of my debate is that we should not ignore documents that we
have developed to assist in the running of the organisation. I have said
it before and say it now without any favor that my support for the
non-change of leadership will not blind me. I am sincerely raising an
issue of constitutional implications which is but part of my conviction
that when things are done in a democratic organisation like SACP, t
he
"rule book" should guide us. The "fulltime" is not in any position of
responsibility but only in that of the GS.
 
I understand that the special congress is not for elections and am
comfortable with comrade Blade at the helm. However, we have developed
the constitution to be the supreme law of the organisation. Even the
sitting of the special congress is a constitutional matter - issues of
delegates, forming of qourum, receiving of reports etc. are all in the
constitution. Therefore, we are slaves of our suppreme rule book - it is
not by choice on when to apply it. So in whatever decision of the party,
the constitution should guide us. I hope I was never ambiguous in my
construction of the sentences. 
 
Will it be difficult Cde Domza to say, yes the GS is doing a good job,
both in government and in the party, why can't we amend the constitution
to suit this situation? Is it difficult to accept that the constitution
as it stands does not accommodate this situation? Do we as communists
want a situation where debates are stiffled by the likes of MDU, DOMZA,
CLARENCE etc? Surely, once we cease to debate issues, we would be left
with no choice but to close this forum.
 
As I debate this matter, I am not afraid to state that the GS should
remain but this should be done in line with the suppreme law of the
SACP. I do not have a blind support on this matter and we all are aware
that we should do it in this way unless we become anarchist-marxists.
 
Amandla!!

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Lebese OE <[email protected]> wrote:



Cdes,
Let us try to remind cde Mdu that;
1.       The GS is not an employee of some company that has its office
hours from 8 * 4. For your benefit the extract says: The General
Secretary shall be the leading National Office Bearer of the SACP and
afull-time officialunder conditions of service determined by the
CC. The General Secretary shall be an ex officio member of all party
structures (Now this does not say 8 * 4 to me and am sure to you too).
2.       From time to time we will need to make decisions based on
conditions at any given time. We need not read our Constitution as if we
are lawyers and it is some kind of Legislation.
3.       The constitution is not meant to block and delay us in
achieving our strategic objectives.
4.       We are a party that has a huge responsibility of pushing the
agenda of the working class and doing *everything in achieving*
socialism in our lifetime. 
5.       This is the same leadership that played an important part in
literally forcing the wheels on the movement back in the right track. 
6.       Changing leadership of the Movement was just but one of the
many things that we needed to do and there is still a lot to be done so
nobody is going to disturb our momentum.
Our National leadership of YCL was spot on when it said through our
National Secretary that the GS is going nowhere.
We will defend and support our leadership and will not be apologetic
for doing so.
Oagile
 
 

From:[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mduduzi H
Vilakazi
Sent: 09 November 2009 12:06 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Blade 'safe from drunk dreamers', Buti
Manamela, Times

 

Cdes,

 

I do not know Cde Malgas what you mean but Cde Adriano raised a debate
on the constitutionality part. If the extracts he made are from an
original copy of the constitution of the SACP then the debate should be
whether the constitution is changed or the incumbent is changed.

 

The extract read as follows:

11. DUTIES OF THE GENERAL SECRETARY


The General Secretary shall be the leading National Office Bearer of
the SACP and a full-time official under conditions of service determined
by the CC. The General Secretary shall be an ex officio member of all
party structures and shall:
11.1 Keep (or cause to be kept) the minutes of all CC and PB meetings
and such other books, records and archives as may be required.
11.2 Attend to the
 correspondence of the CC and PB.
11.3 Maintain regular personal and written contact with all the
provinces and keep the membership informed of the work of the CC and
PB.
11.4 Ensure that members of the CC are kept informed of the work of the
PB in between meetings of the CC.
11.5 Draw up (or cause to be drawn up) all reports and documents as may
be decided upon by the CC or PB.
11.6 The Deputy General Secretary shall, as directed by the CC,
deputise for the General Secretary in respect of all the functions set
out above.
The importance of this constitution will be meaningless if the status
qou remains because the office bearer will be part-time while the
constitution warrants him to be full time. I do not think we should
debate the issue with the view of seating/ un-seating a comrade.
We all love Cde Blade. He took this office knowing that he should be
full-time. General Secretary is an important office. Surely, SACP has
many tried and tested comrades, if the constitution remains unchanged,
then someone should (in line with the constitution) replace Cde Blade.
So, my take is that the constitution should be amended or a new GS be
elected at conference (if no constitutional amendment is envisaged). It
is not about whether one is good in multi-tasking or not. It is about
the constitutional obligations of the organization we so dearly love.
I pause!
 
This message and any attachments relating to official business of the
Mpumalanga Provincial Government (MPG)is proprietary to the MPGand
intended for the original addressee only. The message may contain
information that is confidential and subject to legal privilege. Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. If
you receive this message in error, please notify the original sender
immediately and destroy the original message. If you are not the
intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you
must not disseminate, copy, use, distribute, or take any action in
connection therewith. The MPGcannot insure that the integrity of this
communication has been maintained, nor that it is free of errors,
viruses, interception and / or interference. TheMPGis not liable
whatsoever for loss or damage resulting from the opening of this message
and / or attachments and / or the use of the information contained in
this message and / or attachments.
 ( http://www.mpumalanga.gov.za/ )


 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail is subjected to the disclaimer that can be viewed at:
http://www.fdc.co.za/disclaimer/ 

Email Managed by MailXServer - http://www.mailxserver.com/ 
-----------------------------------------------------------------





Please find our Email Disclaimer here: http://www.ukzn.ac.za/disclaimer/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to