On Apr 22, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Darren Middleman wrote:
Did we ever reach a final consensus on what approach to take with
logging?
It seemed from the previous threads that there was sstill
disagreement on
which logging system to use. Now that we are moving ahead with the
development of bindings, tools, etc. for yoko, it would be nice to
come to a
final agreement so that we know where to go from here.
From my perspective, since parts of the Yoko project will be based
on apis
and runtimes from the Celtix project (namely the bindings and
tools), it
would be desirable to continue using the logging that is used in
Celtix, in
other words, JDK logging. This should allow for the easiest
integration
between the various Yoko components and the Celtix components Yoko
will be
using.
Thoughts?
I like Dain's idea of monitors. It's a much more powerful paradigm.
I completely agree. Requires a lot more thought up front but
eliminates the need for this kind of discussion.
thanks
david jencks
Regards,
Alan
