Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
With that said, I think that we are treading in that gray area called
personal preference and that no one can reasonably throw a technical
veto on any of the above solutions; though there is one exception of
_requiring_ 3rd party loggers, which I think we have a consensus on
that being a bad thing in light of our inclusion of Harmony. I think
that everyone has had their say and that we are ready for a vote. If
there are no objections by Wednesday, I'll start such a vote.
Please start the vote. I would gladly do it myself, but I'm not so
sure about what is required for a vote.
Best regards,
Anders
Same here, I'm not sure either. Should this be a multiple choice vote or
a vote that just presents the option which seems to have the most
support / least resistance (based on earlier emails) and checks that
there is no veto?
Regards,
Lars
