+1 I have tested the binary and src distributions on windows XP
and all looks well.

We should make sure the keys are correct first though.

Cheers, Edell. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mosur Ravi, Balaji 
Sent: 28 September 2006 13:03
To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release

Hi lars,

The keys are not in the keyserver yet, so try to follow the steps in: 
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html

You might have to first do an import & then verify...

gpg --import KEYS

gpg --verify foo-1.0.tar.gz.asc foo-1.0.tar.gz

Let me know if this works...

- Balaji

-----Original Message-----
From: Lars Kühne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 1:00 AM
To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release

Mosur Ravi, Balaji wrote:
> Please vote to publish the Milestone 1 release distributions. Please 
> take some time to download the distributions, review them and test 
> them in your environment before voting.
>
>   

Is anyone able to verify the signature? I'm a beginner with PGP, so the problem 
may very well be on my end. I followed the instructions on 
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/verification.html

    ~/downloads> gpg yoko-1.0-incubating-M1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz.asc
    gpg: Signature made Wed 20 Sep 2006 03:09:10 PM CEST using RSA key
    ID 03FE48F6
    gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
    ~/downloads> gpg < $YOKO/trunk/KEYS
    pub   512R/BA5A3775 2006-08-10 bravi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    ~/downloads> gpg yoko-1.0-incubating-M1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz.asc
    gpg: Signature made Wed 20 Sep 2006 03:09:10 PM CEST using RSA key
    ID 03FE48F6
    gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found

The key used to sign the code is also not available via pgpkeys.mit.edu (see 
KEYS file in trunk).

    ~/downloads> gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key 03FE48F6
    gpgkeys: WARNING: this is an *experimental* HKP interface!
    gpgkeys: key 03FE48F6 not found on keyserver
    gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.


Maybe the problem is that the ID used (03FE48F6) is different from the key id 
in the keys file (BA5A3775)?

Other than that I've only found some minor flaws:

    * the example code uses a yoko BootManager. There should be a
      comment in the code that this is only to minimize the required
      infrastructure for the example and typically clients find their
      servers in an implementation independent way like CosNaming.
    * the XMLSchema section of the NOTICE file contains capitalization
      errors, lowercase "apache software foundation")

I don't think any of those should prevent a release.

-1 until someone can verify the file signatures, +1 after that.

/Lars




Reply via email to