The public keys are in the KEYS file in subversion.

So I think we are good to go!

Thanks, Edell. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 28 September 2006 16:11
To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release

IIUC, the keys do not have to be in a web of trust so long as the public key is 
checked into the KEYS file in subversion.


Regards,
Alan


On Sep 28, 2006, at 7:30 AM, Nolan, Edell wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I imported the KEYS
>
> Command => gpg --verify yoko-1.0-incubating-M1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip.asc
>
> And I get
>
> C:\temp>gpg --verify yoko-1.0-incubating-M1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip.asc
> gpg: Signature made 09/20/06 14:09:36  using RSA key ID 03FE48F6
> gpg: Good signature from "Balaji Ravi (bravi) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> gpg: checking the trustdb
> gpg: checking at depth 0 signed=0 ot(-/q/n/m/f/u)=0/0/0/0/0/1
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to  
> the owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: C174 4222 AD4D 0AFA 4F9E  73D1 0879 B610 03FE 
> 48F6
>
> Edell.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mosur Ravi, Balaji
> Sent: 28 September 2006 14:02
> To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release
>
> Hi edell,
>
> Were you able to verify the signature?
>
> - Balaji
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nolan, Edell
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 8:52 AM
> To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release
>
> +1 I have tested the binary and src distributions on windows XP
> and all looks well.
>
> We should make sure the keys are correct first though.
>
> Cheers, Edell.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mosur Ravi, Balaji
> Sent: 28 September 2006 13:03
> To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release
>
> Hi lars,
>
> The keys are not in the keyserver yet, so try to follow the steps
> in: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html
>
> You might have to first do an import & then verify...
>
> gpg --import KEYS
>
> gpg --verify foo-1.0.tar.gz.asc foo-1.0.tar.gz
>
> Let me know if this works...
>
> - Balaji
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Kühne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 1:00 AM
> To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Publish Yoko M1 release
>
> Mosur Ravi, Balaji wrote:
>> Please vote to publish the Milestone 1 release distributions. Please 
>> take some time to download the distributions, review them and test 
>> them in your environment before voting.
>>
>>
>
> Is anyone able to verify the signature? I'm a beginner with PGP, so 
> the problem may very well be on my end. I followed the instructions on 
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/verification.html
>
>     ~/downloads> gpg yoko-1.0-incubating-M1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz.asc
>     gpg: Signature made Wed 20 Sep 2006 03:09:10 PM CEST using RSA key
>     ID 03FE48F6
>     gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>     ~/downloads> gpg < $YOKO/trunk/KEYS
>     pub   512R/BA5A3775 2006-08-10 bravi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     ~/downloads> gpg yoko-1.0-incubating-M1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz.asc
>     gpg: Signature made Wed 20 Sep 2006 03:09:10 PM CEST using RSA key
>     ID 03FE48F6
>     gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>
> The key used to sign the code is also not available via 
> pgpkeys.mit.edu (see KEYS file in trunk).
>
>     ~/downloads> gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key 03FE48F6
>     gpgkeys: WARNING: this is an *experimental* HKP interface!
>     gpgkeys: key 03FE48F6 not found on keyserver
>     gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
>
>
> Maybe the problem is that the ID used (03FE48F6) is different from the 
> key id in the keys file (BA5A3775)?
>
> Other than that I've only found some minor flaws:
>
>     * the example code uses a yoko BootManager. There should be a
>       comment in the code that this is only to minimize the required
>       infrastructure for the example and typically clients find their
>       servers in an implementation independent way like CosNaming.
>     * the XMLSchema section of the NOTICE file contains capitalization
>       errors, lowercase "apache software foundation")
>
> I don't think any of those should prevent a release.
>
> -1 until someone can verify the file signatures, +1 after that.
>
> /Lars
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



Reply via email to