On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 07:04 -0400, James Bowes wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:04:54 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > Agreed. This feels similar to installonlyn. Hey, where does > > > installonlyn live, anyways? > > > > pkg cvs ;-) > > How about installonlyn and the hypothetical protectX move into yum > proper? >
not sure I'd be happy with plugins in yum proper. It would make sense for them to be in yum-utils but then that would mean making sure that the install of them in yum doesn't conflict with the plugin in yum-utils. -sv _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
