On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 10:41 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:46:40AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > How about installonlyn and the hypothetical protectX move into yum > > > proper? > > not sure I'd be happy with plugins in yum proper. It would make sense > > for them to be in yum-utils but then that would mean making sure that > > the install of them in yum doesn't conflict with the plugin in > > yum-utils. > > Right now, it's only isntallonlyn. We can convince Jeremy to move that, > right? And then the updated yum package could have a Requires line to make > sure it gets installed.
Initially it was in yum proper because yum was in Core, yum-utils was going to be in Extras and thus everyone can tell the next bits :) Jeremy _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
