On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:46:40AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > How about installonlyn and the hypothetical protectX move into yum > > proper? > not sure I'd be happy with plugins in yum proper. It would make sense > for them to be in yum-utils but then that would mean making sure that > the install of them in yum doesn't conflict with the plugin in > yum-utils.
Right now, it's only isntallonlyn. We can convince Jeremy to move that, right? And then the updated yum package could have a Requires line to make sure it gets installed. -- Matthew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
