Mark Ryden wrote: > Hello, >> Here is a passage from around line 236 of zd_mac.c: > > 1) At which tree are you you looking ? > I have the wireless-next-2.6 .git tree (updated as true for today). > There is no such comment in this file
Sorry, quoted the wrong file - it is zd_usb.c - I had wireless-testing, but that paragraph is in wireless-next-2.6 too: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git;a=blob_plain;f=drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/zd_usb.c;hb=HEAD http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-testing.git;a=blob_plain;f=drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/zd_usb.c;hb=HEAD > > 2) >> I am going to make myself very unpopular > This is indeed so. Why should I not use the new driver ? > this firmware question should be solved; it has nothing to do with > the new AD-HOC feature, which was added recently. "Because it doesn't work for your device"? That paragraph seems to suggest that a solution to your problem is in the vendor driver but is considered to ugly to copy. There is a clean driver which does not work for your device, or an ugly driver which does, but not one that is both clean and work for your device (at the moment). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Zd1211-devs mailing list - http://zd1211.wiki.sourceforge.net/ Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zd1211-devs
