--- In [email protected], "Bill!" <BillSmart@...> wrote:
>
> ED,
>
> I'm not saying that proselytizing is good or bad. It all depends on
what you're selling.

What you appear to say is that to proselytize is good or bad to a buyer,
dependent on what the seller is selling, and on the preferences of the
buyer. This makes sense.

> I just stated that from my experience the proseltizing associated with
Zen Buddhism is from the Buddhist side, not the zen side.

IMO, there is nothing 'wrong' with proselytizing. For instance,
advertising is one form of proselytizing, and is a keystone of commerce.

> Also there is a well-known credo in zen that a student will only ripen
when he/she is ready. A teacher can't hasten that by proselitizing or
marketing.

It is a truism that a student will ripen at his own pace. The objective
of proselytizing is to capture the seeker's interest in some specific
belief system. To proselytize adults is not deemed to be illegal nor
immoral in Western democracies.

> I'll refer you back to all the zen stories, myths (and the parallel
scene in FIGHT CLUB) where the would-be students are rejected time and
time aqain, and only accepeted when the teacher is sure they are sincere
and ready. This is the opposite of prosetising to me.
>
> ...Bill!

It is quite usual for an aspirant to be vetted by the leader of a group
to ensure the aspirant's compatibility with the values and objectives of
the group.

--ED







Reply via email to