On 02/16/2011 06:06 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Martin Sustrik<sust...@250bpm.com> wrote: > >> I am volunteering to pass on the patches that should be backported to the >> stable. However, I probably won't be able to do the actual backports, >> testing etc. > > Ah excellent! Then I'm volunteering to apply those patches to a > stabilization branch of 2.1.1, and make sure the results work by the > time it's marked 'stable'.
Great! Let's try that then. Let me know which point you want to branch from and I'll send you the list of subsequent patches to backport. > I'd prefer to work with a separate repository for that and pull > requests (or if that's too hard, issues with attached patches). Agreed. > However before we jump in, we need more consensus especially on how > this affects the maint branch (which is 2.0.10). Are you backporting > fixes to maint today? Or rather, forward porting maint fixes to > master? Not really. 2.1 has diverged too far from 2.0 to make most 2.1 patches applicable to 2.0. I believe that with 2.1 stable we can start moving away from 2.0. Martin _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
