Hello all, On 08/11/2011 09:26, Schmurfy wrote: > Hi, > As a (mostly) silent watcher of this mailing list I really have the > impression than beyond tests or experimentation the 3.0 branch is not > really used which would not be that surprinsing for a beta version. We are using 3.0.x! Our project is still in development phase but close to production. We took the decision to go for ZMQ 3 because we need the nice pub/sub subscription forwarding feature. We knew that 3 was categorized as unstable but we understood unstable as not reliable because new piece of software. We did take it as unstable because features will still be added/removed!
It is our way to participate in open source development to take "unstable" release, to use it and to report any bug found to developers in order to stabilize the product. Therefore my vote is rather option 3 (if possible) But it is not that dramatic if option 2 is selected but please, once it is decided, stay with the decision! Regards Emmanuel Taurel _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
