Oh yes, I'd love to move into the community organization! Let me update the
README file (MPLv2 and C4.1 look good) and do some more document work.

Thank you!


BR,
Fantix
--
http://about.me/fantix


On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Fantix,
>
> Nice stuff. If you want to move this into the ZeroMQ community
> organization, see http://zeromq.org/docs:organization
>
> -Pieter
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Fantix King <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I think it might be easier to have discussions if there is actual code -
> > I've started a project "zmq.rs" with some very basic scratches:
> >
> > https://github.com/decentfox/zmq.rs
> >
> > The code now is meant to be discussed and heavily changed incrementally,
> > hopefully with tests carefully covered. Please feel free to drop by and
> > comment if you are interested, it is truly appreciated.
> >
> >
> > BR,
> > Fantix
> > --
> > http://about.me/fantix
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Fantix King <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sounds really exciting! Please share the project link when there is one
> if
> >> possible.
> >>
> >> BR,
> >> Fantix
> >> --
> >> http://about.me/fantix
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Charles Remes <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> There was a little twitter chat over the weekend regarding an attempt
> at
> >>> writing a ground-up zeromq library using the new systems language
> Rust. If
> >>> you haven't heard of Rust, it is a new language under development by
> the
> >>> good folks at Mozilla. It's original designer has said that he has
> learned
> >>> quite a few things from implementing dozens of languages over the
> years that
> >>> he felt he could solve some new problems and create a cleaner
> language. Rust
> >>> is his attempt at such a feat.
> >>>
> >>> It supposedly solves the problem by borrowing the best from many
> popular
> >>> languages.
> >>>
> >>>         * OOP of C++ without the large, unwieldy syntax
> >>>
> >>>         * performance of C while providing good namespacing, OOP, safe
> >>> memory (i.e. no dangling pointers)
> >>>
> >>>         * the functional expressiveness of Haskell but not at the
> expense
> >>> of imperative forms
> >>>
> >>>         * the massive concurrency of Erlang but with a better syntax
> and
> >>> a more flexible memory model (borrowed pointers, immutable defaults,
> etc)
> >>>
> >>> I recently did a small test project to learn the syntax. The language
> is
> >>> still evolving, so it's a bit of a moving target. It's at release 0.9
> with a
> >>> 1.0 slated for later this year, but they've already slipped on
> delivering a
> >>> 1.0 for at least a year so I assume it will slip again.
> >>>
> >>> Anyway, I'd like to volunteer to try and spike a simple example to get
> >>> things started. However, I'd like to start a thread here to discuss
> "lessons
> >>> learned" from the existing codebase. We already have a great write-up
> from
> >>> Martin Sustrik (primary author of earlier versions of zeromq) here:
> >>>
> >>> http://250bpm.com/blog:4
> >>>
> >>> http://250bpm.com/blog:8
> >>>
> >>> I'm hoping that others who have read through the source have additional
> >>> insights that they'd like to share. For instance, I have seen comments
> that
> >>> zeromq might have more consistent performance it it was wrapped around
> a
> >>> Disruptor (google for that pattern if it's new to you). People also
> seem to
> >>> really dislike the concept of the context (nanomsg has already
> eliminated
> >>> this... it still exists but is hidden by the library).
> >>>
> >>> Any other insights?
> >>>
> >>> cr
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> zeromq-dev mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to