Hi Pieter, I've updated the README file according to the requests and recommendation in docs:organization, and also draw some diagrams for a simple design document here:
https://github.com/decentfox/zmq.rs/wiki/Design Hopefully this could make the code clearer and easier to be co-worked on. Please advice if something can be done better. :) Thank you! BR, Fantix -- http://about.me/fantix On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Fantix King <fantix.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh yes, I'd love to move into the community organization! Let me update > the README file (MPLv2 and C4.1 look good) and do some more document work. > > Thank you! > > > BR, > Fantix > -- > http://about.me/fantix > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote: > >> Hi Fantix, >> >> Nice stuff. If you want to move this into the ZeroMQ community >> organization, see http://zeromq.org/docs:organization >> >> -Pieter >> >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Fantix King <fantix.k...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I think it might be easier to have discussions if there is actual code - >> > I've started a project "zmq.rs" with some very basic scratches: >> > >> > https://github.com/decentfox/zmq.rs >> > >> > The code now is meant to be discussed and heavily changed incrementally, >> > hopefully with tests carefully covered. Please feel free to drop by and >> > comment if you are interested, it is truly appreciated. >> > >> > >> > BR, >> > Fantix >> > -- >> > http://about.me/fantix >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Fantix King <fantix.k...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Sounds really exciting! Please share the project link when there is >> one if >> >> possible. >> >> >> >> BR, >> >> Fantix >> >> -- >> >> http://about.me/fantix >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Charles Remes <li...@chuckremes.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> There was a little twitter chat over the weekend regarding an attempt >> at >> >>> writing a ground-up zeromq library using the new systems language >> Rust. If >> >>> you haven't heard of Rust, it is a new language under development by >> the >> >>> good folks at Mozilla. It's original designer has said that he has >> learned >> >>> quite a few things from implementing dozens of languages over the >> years that >> >>> he felt he could solve some new problems and create a cleaner >> language. Rust >> >>> is his attempt at such a feat. >> >>> >> >>> It supposedly solves the problem by borrowing the best from many >> popular >> >>> languages. >> >>> >> >>> * OOP of C++ without the large, unwieldy syntax >> >>> >> >>> * performance of C while providing good namespacing, OOP, safe >> >>> memory (i.e. no dangling pointers) >> >>> >> >>> * the functional expressiveness of Haskell but not at the >> expense >> >>> of imperative forms >> >>> >> >>> * the massive concurrency of Erlang but with a better syntax >> and >> >>> a more flexible memory model (borrowed pointers, immutable defaults, >> etc) >> >>> >> >>> I recently did a small test project to learn the syntax. The language >> is >> >>> still evolving, so it's a bit of a moving target. It's at release 0.9 >> with a >> >>> 1.0 slated for later this year, but they've already slipped on >> delivering a >> >>> 1.0 for at least a year so I assume it will slip again. >> >>> >> >>> Anyway, I'd like to volunteer to try and spike a simple example to get >> >>> things started. However, I'd like to start a thread here to discuss >> "lessons >> >>> learned" from the existing codebase. We already have a great write-up >> from >> >>> Martin Sustrik (primary author of earlier versions of zeromq) here: >> >>> >> >>> http://250bpm.com/blog:4 >> >>> >> >>> http://250bpm.com/blog:8 >> >>> >> >>> I'm hoping that others who have read through the source have >> additional >> >>> insights that they'd like to share. For instance, I have seen >> comments that >> >>> zeromq might have more consistent performance it it was wrapped >> around a >> >>> Disruptor (google for that pattern if it's new to you). People also >> seem to >> >>> really dislike the concept of the context (nanomsg has already >> eliminated >> >>> this... it still exists but is hidden by the library). >> >>> >> >>> Any other insights? >> >>> >> >>> cr >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >> >>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > zeromq-dev mailing list >> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> zeromq-dev mailing list >> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> > >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
