On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Fantix, you are now a member of the ZeroMQ owners team, with all > the power and responsibility. :-) Welcome. > Thank you, sir! ;) > > The next step is to rename/move the repository to zeromq and then fork > it back to your personal account. > Ack, I'm on it. > > It's really nice to have (I think) our first Chinese-originated project. > What an honor! I'll try my best to work it out. :) Thank you! BR, Fantix -- http://about.me/fantix > > -Pieter > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Fantix King <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Pieter, > > > > I've updated the README file according to the requests and > recommendation in > > docs:organization, and also draw some diagrams for a simple design > document > > here: > > > > https://github.com/decentfox/zmq.rs/wiki/Design > > > > Hopefully this could make the code clearer and easier to be co-worked on. > > > > Please advice if something can be done better. :) Thank you! > > > > > > > > BR, > > Fantix > > -- > > http://about.me/fantix > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Fantix King <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Oh yes, I'd love to move into the community organization! Let me update > >> the README file (MPLv2 and C4.1 look good) and do some more document > work. > >> > >> Thank you! > >> > >> > >> BR, > >> Fantix > >> -- > >> http://about.me/fantix > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Fantix, > >>> > >>> Nice stuff. If you want to move this into the ZeroMQ community > >>> organization, see http://zeromq.org/docs:organization > >>> > >>> -Pieter > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Fantix King <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > I think it might be easier to have discussions if there is actual > code > >>> > - > >>> > I've started a project "zmq.rs" with some very basic scratches: > >>> > > >>> > https://github.com/decentfox/zmq.rs > >>> > > >>> > The code now is meant to be discussed and heavily changed > >>> > incrementally, > >>> > hopefully with tests carefully covered. Please feel free to drop by > and > >>> > comment if you are interested, it is truly appreciated. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > BR, > >>> > Fantix > >>> > -- > >>> > http://about.me/fantix > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Fantix King <[email protected]> > >>> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> Sounds really exciting! Please share the project link when there is > >>> >> one if > >>> >> possible. > >>> >> > >>> >> BR, > >>> >> Fantix > >>> >> -- > >>> >> http://about.me/fantix > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Charles Remes <[email protected] > > > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>> There was a little twitter chat over the weekend regarding an > attempt > >>> >>> at > >>> >>> writing a ground-up zeromq library using the new systems language > >>> >>> Rust. If > >>> >>> you haven't heard of Rust, it is a new language under development > by > >>> >>> the > >>> >>> good folks at Mozilla. It's original designer has said that he has > >>> >>> learned > >>> >>> quite a few things from implementing dozens of languages over the > >>> >>> years that > >>> >>> he felt he could solve some new problems and create a cleaner > >>> >>> language. Rust > >>> >>> is his attempt at such a feat. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> It supposedly solves the problem by borrowing the best from many > >>> >>> popular > >>> >>> languages. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> * OOP of C++ without the large, unwieldy syntax > >>> >>> > >>> >>> * performance of C while providing good namespacing, OOP, > >>> >>> safe > >>> >>> memory (i.e. no dangling pointers) > >>> >>> > >>> >>> * the functional expressiveness of Haskell but not at the > >>> >>> expense > >>> >>> of imperative forms > >>> >>> > >>> >>> * the massive concurrency of Erlang but with a better > syntax > >>> >>> and > >>> >>> a more flexible memory model (borrowed pointers, immutable > defaults, > >>> >>> etc) > >>> >>> > >>> >>> I recently did a small test project to learn the syntax. The > language > >>> >>> is > >>> >>> still evolving, so it's a bit of a moving target. It's at release > 0.9 > >>> >>> with a > >>> >>> 1.0 slated for later this year, but they've already slipped on > >>> >>> delivering a > >>> >>> 1.0 for at least a year so I assume it will slip again. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Anyway, I'd like to volunteer to try and spike a simple example to > >>> >>> get > >>> >>> things started. However, I'd like to start a thread here to discuss > >>> >>> "lessons > >>> >>> learned" from the existing codebase. We already have a great > write-up > >>> >>> from > >>> >>> Martin Sustrik (primary author of earlier versions of zeromq) here: > >>> >>> > >>> >>> http://250bpm.com/blog:4 > >>> >>> > >>> >>> http://250bpm.com/blog:8 > >>> >>> > >>> >>> I'm hoping that others who have read through the source have > >>> >>> additional > >>> >>> insights that they'd like to share. For instance, I have seen > >>> >>> comments that > >>> >>> zeromq might have more consistent performance it it was wrapped > >>> >>> around a > >>> >>> Disruptor (google for that pattern if it's new to you). People also > >>> >>> seem to > >>> >>> really dislike the concept of the context (nanomsg has already > >>> >>> eliminated > >>> >>> this... it still exists but is hidden by the library). > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Any other insights? > >>> >>> > >>> >>> cr > >>> >>> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> >>> zeromq-dev mailing list > >>> >>> [email protected] > >>> >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > zeromq-dev mailing list > >>> > [email protected] > >>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> zeromq-dev mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > >> > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zeromq-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
