On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote:

> Hi Fantix, you are now a member of the ZeroMQ owners team, with all
> the power and responsibility. :-) Welcome.
>

Thank you, sir! ;)


>
> The next step is to rename/move the repository to zeromq and then fork
> it back to your personal account.
>

Ack, I'm on it.


>
> It's really nice to have (I think) our first Chinese-originated project.
>

What an honor! I'll try my best to work it out. :) Thank you!


BR,
Fantix
--
http://about.me/fantix



>
> -Pieter
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Fantix King <fantix.k...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Pieter,
> >
> > I've updated the README file according to the requests and
> recommendation in
> > docs:organization, and also draw some diagrams for a simple design
> document
> > here:
> >
> > https://github.com/decentfox/zmq.rs/wiki/Design
> >
> > Hopefully this could make the code clearer and easier to be co-worked on.
> >
> > Please advice if something can be done better. :) Thank you!
> >
> >
> >
> > BR,
> > Fantix
> > --
> > http://about.me/fantix
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Fantix King <fantix.k...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Oh yes, I'd love to move into the community organization! Let me update
> >> the README file (MPLv2 and C4.1 look good) and do some more document
> work.
> >>
> >> Thank you!
> >>
> >>
> >> BR,
> >> Fantix
> >> --
> >> http://about.me/fantix
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Fantix,
> >>>
> >>> Nice stuff. If you want to move this into the ZeroMQ community
> >>> organization, see http://zeromq.org/docs:organization
> >>>
> >>> -Pieter
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Fantix King <fantix.k...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > I think it might be easier to have discussions if there is actual
> code
> >>> > -
> >>> > I've started a project "zmq.rs" with some very basic scratches:
> >>> >
> >>> > https://github.com/decentfox/zmq.rs
> >>> >
> >>> > The code now is meant to be discussed and heavily changed
> >>> > incrementally,
> >>> > hopefully with tests carefully covered. Please feel free to drop by
> and
> >>> > comment if you are interested, it is truly appreciated.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > BR,
> >>> > Fantix
> >>> > --
> >>> > http://about.me/fantix
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Fantix King <fantix.k...@gmail.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Sounds really exciting! Please share the project link when there is
> >>> >> one if
> >>> >> possible.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> BR,
> >>> >> Fantix
> >>> >> --
> >>> >> http://about.me/fantix
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Charles Remes <li...@chuckremes.com
> >
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> There was a little twitter chat over the weekend regarding an
> attempt
> >>> >>> at
> >>> >>> writing a ground-up zeromq library using the new systems language
> >>> >>> Rust. If
> >>> >>> you haven't heard of Rust, it is a new language under development
> by
> >>> >>> the
> >>> >>> good folks at Mozilla. It's original designer has said that he has
> >>> >>> learned
> >>> >>> quite a few things from implementing dozens of languages over the
> >>> >>> years that
> >>> >>> he felt he could solve some new problems and create a cleaner
> >>> >>> language. Rust
> >>> >>> is his attempt at such a feat.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> It supposedly solves the problem by borrowing the best from many
> >>> >>> popular
> >>> >>> languages.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>         * OOP of C++ without the large, unwieldy syntax
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>         * performance of C while providing good namespacing, OOP,
> >>> >>> safe
> >>> >>> memory (i.e. no dangling pointers)
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>         * the functional expressiveness of Haskell but not at the
> >>> >>> expense
> >>> >>> of imperative forms
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>         * the massive concurrency of Erlang but with a better
> syntax
> >>> >>> and
> >>> >>> a more flexible memory model (borrowed pointers, immutable
> defaults,
> >>> >>> etc)
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> I recently did a small test project to learn the syntax. The
> language
> >>> >>> is
> >>> >>> still evolving, so it's a bit of a moving target. It's at release
> 0.9
> >>> >>> with a
> >>> >>> 1.0 slated for later this year, but they've already slipped on
> >>> >>> delivering a
> >>> >>> 1.0 for at least a year so I assume it will slip again.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Anyway, I'd like to volunteer to try and spike a simple example to
> >>> >>> get
> >>> >>> things started. However, I'd like to start a thread here to discuss
> >>> >>> "lessons
> >>> >>> learned" from the existing codebase. We already have a great
> write-up
> >>> >>> from
> >>> >>> Martin Sustrik (primary author of earlier versions of zeromq) here:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> http://250bpm.com/blog:4
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> http://250bpm.com/blog:8
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> I'm hoping that others who have read through the source have
> >>> >>> additional
> >>> >>> insights that they'd like to share. For instance, I have seen
> >>> >>> comments that
> >>> >>> zeromq might have more consistent performance it it was wrapped
> >>> >>> around a
> >>> >>> Disruptor (google for that pattern if it's new to you). People also
> >>> >>> seem to
> >>> >>> really dislike the concept of the context (nanomsg has already
> >>> >>> eliminated
> >>> >>> this... it still exists but is hidden by the library).
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Any other insights?
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> cr
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> >>> zeromq-dev mailing list
> >>> >>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> >>> >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> >>> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> >>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >>> >
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> zeromq-dev mailing list
> >>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
>
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to