Hi Fantix, you are now a member of the ZeroMQ owners team, with all the power and responsibility. :-) Welcome.
The next step is to rename/move the repository to zeromq and then fork it back to your personal account. It's really nice to have (I think) our first Chinese-originated project. -Pieter On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Fantix King <fantix.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Pieter, > > I've updated the README file according to the requests and recommendation in > docs:organization, and also draw some diagrams for a simple design document > here: > > https://github.com/decentfox/zmq.rs/wiki/Design > > Hopefully this could make the code clearer and easier to be co-worked on. > > Please advice if something can be done better. :) Thank you! > > > > BR, > Fantix > -- > http://about.me/fantix > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Fantix King <fantix.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Oh yes, I'd love to move into the community organization! Let me update >> the README file (MPLv2 and C4.1 look good) and do some more document work. >> >> Thank you! >> >> >> BR, >> Fantix >> -- >> http://about.me/fantix >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Pieter Hintjens <p...@imatix.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Fantix, >>> >>> Nice stuff. If you want to move this into the ZeroMQ community >>> organization, see http://zeromq.org/docs:organization >>> >>> -Pieter >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Fantix King <fantix.k...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > I think it might be easier to have discussions if there is actual code >>> > - >>> > I've started a project "zmq.rs" with some very basic scratches: >>> > >>> > https://github.com/decentfox/zmq.rs >>> > >>> > The code now is meant to be discussed and heavily changed >>> > incrementally, >>> > hopefully with tests carefully covered. Please feel free to drop by and >>> > comment if you are interested, it is truly appreciated. >>> > >>> > >>> > BR, >>> > Fantix >>> > -- >>> > http://about.me/fantix >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Fantix King <fantix.k...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Sounds really exciting! Please share the project link when there is >>> >> one if >>> >> possible. >>> >> >>> >> BR, >>> >> Fantix >>> >> -- >>> >> http://about.me/fantix >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Charles Remes <li...@chuckremes.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> There was a little twitter chat over the weekend regarding an attempt >>> >>> at >>> >>> writing a ground-up zeromq library using the new systems language >>> >>> Rust. If >>> >>> you haven’t heard of Rust, it is a new language under development by >>> >>> the >>> >>> good folks at Mozilla. It’s original designer has said that he has >>> >>> learned >>> >>> quite a few things from implementing dozens of languages over the >>> >>> years that >>> >>> he felt he could solve some new problems and create a cleaner >>> >>> language. Rust >>> >>> is his attempt at such a feat. >>> >>> >>> >>> It supposedly solves the problem by borrowing the best from many >>> >>> popular >>> >>> languages. >>> >>> >>> >>> * OOP of C++ without the large, unwieldy syntax >>> >>> >>> >>> * performance of C while providing good namespacing, OOP, >>> >>> safe >>> >>> memory (i.e. no dangling pointers) >>> >>> >>> >>> * the functional expressiveness of Haskell but not at the >>> >>> expense >>> >>> of imperative forms >>> >>> >>> >>> * the massive concurrency of Erlang but with a better syntax >>> >>> and >>> >>> a more flexible memory model (borrowed pointers, immutable defaults, >>> >>> etc) >>> >>> >>> >>> I recently did a small test project to learn the syntax. The language >>> >>> is >>> >>> still evolving, so it’s a bit of a moving target. It’s at release 0.9 >>> >>> with a >>> >>> 1.0 slated for later this year, but they’ve already slipped on >>> >>> delivering a >>> >>> 1.0 for at least a year so I assume it will slip again. >>> >>> >>> >>> Anyway, I’d like to volunteer to try and spike a simple example to >>> >>> get >>> >>> things started. However, I’d like to start a thread here to discuss >>> >>> “lessons >>> >>> learned” from the existing codebase. We already have a great write-up >>> >>> from >>> >>> Martin Sustrik (primary author of earlier versions of zeromq) here: >>> >>> >>> >>> http://250bpm.com/blog:4 >>> >>> >>> >>> http://250bpm.com/blog:8 >>> >>> >>> >>> I’m hoping that others who have read through the source have >>> >>> additional >>> >>> insights that they’d like to share. For instance, I have seen >>> >>> comments that >>> >>> zeromq might have more consistent performance it it was wrapped >>> >>> around a >>> >>> Disruptor (google for that pattern if it’s new to you). People also >>> >>> seem to >>> >>> really dislike the concept of the context (nanomsg has already >>> >>> eliminated >>> >>> this… it still exists but is hidden by the library). >>> >>> >>> >>> Any other insights? >>> >>> >>> >>> cr >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>> >>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >>> >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > zeromq-dev mailing list >>> > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >>> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> zeromq-dev mailing list >>> zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org >>> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev > _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
