On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:08:07AM -0700, Adam Leventhal wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:34:13PM +0200, Constantin Gonzalez wrote: > > - RAID-Z is _very_ slow when one disk is broken. > > Do you have data on this? The reconstruction should be relatively cheap > especially when compared with the initial disk access. >
Also, what is your definition of "broken"? Does this mean the device appears as FAULTED in the pool status, or that the drive is present and not responding? If it's the latter, this will be fixed by my upcoming FMA work. - Eric -- Eric Schrock, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
