Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> X4500 problems seconded. Still having issues with port resets due to
> the Marvell driver. Though they seem considerably more transient and
> less likely to lock up the entire systems in the most recent ( >b72)
> OpenSolaris builds.
>   
Build 72 is pretty old.  The build date for that build was August 27, 2007.
It looks like build 75 should have been pretty good (October 8, 2007), but
for absolute, most up-to-date stuff you want build 84 (which will be
in a build on February 25, 2008).  The source code changes are
already visible in OpenSolaris and the marvell88sx binary is likewise
down loadable (I wish I could provide the source, but Marvell says "no").

Please try something more recent than over 5 months old.

Regards,
Lida
> -J
>
> On Feb 12, 2008 9:35 AM, Carson Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> Tim wrote:
>>     
>>> A much cheaper (and probably the BEST supported card), is the supermicro
>>> based on the marvell chipset.  This is the same chipset that is used in
>>> the thumper x4500 so you know that the folks at sun are doing their due
>>> diligence to make sure the drivers are solid.
>>>       
>> Except the drivers _aren't_ solid, at least in Solaris(tm). The
>> OpenSolaris drivers may have been fixed (I know a lot of work is going
>> into them, but I haven't tested them), but those fixes have not made it
>> back into the supported realm.
>>
>> So if you need to run a supported OS, I'd skip the Marvell chips if
>> possible, at least for now.
>>
>> --
>> Carson
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zfs-discuss mailing list
>> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>   

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to