Heh, sounds like there are a few problems with that tool then. I guess that's
one of the benefits of me being so new to Solaris. I'm still learning all the
command line tools so I'm playing with the graphical stuff as much as possible.
:)
Regarding the delay, I plan to have a go tomorrow and see just how much of a
delay there can be. I've definately had the system up for 10 minutes still
reading data that's going to disappear on reboot and suspect I can stretch it a
lot longer than that.
The biggest concern for me with the delay is that the data appears fine to all
intents & purposes. You can read it off the pool and copy it elsewhere. There
doesn't seem to be any indication that it's going to disappear after a reboot.
> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:35:21 -0500> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [zfs-discuss] Supermicro AOC-SAT2-MV8 hang when
> drive removed> > On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Ross Smith wrote:> > >> > "File
> Browser" is the name of the program that Solaris opens when > > you open
> "Computer" on the desktop. It's the default graphical file > > manager.> >
> Got it. I have brought it up once or twice. I tend to distrust such > tools
> since I am not sure if their implementation is sound. In fact, > usually it
> is not.> > Now that you mention this tool, I am going to see what happens
> when it > enters my test directory containing a million files. Hmmm, this
> turd > says "Loading" and I see that system error messages are scrolling by >
> as fast as dtrace can report them:> > nautilus ioctl 25 Inappropriate ioctl
> for device> nautilus acl 89 Unsupported file system operation> nautilus ioctl
> 25 Inappropriate ioctl for device> nautilus acl 89 Unsupported file system
> operation> nautilus ioctl 25 Inappropriate ioctl for device> > we shall see
> if it crashes or if it eventually returns. Ahhh, it has > returned and
> declared that my directory with a million files is > "(Empty)". So much for a
> short stint of trusting this tool.> > > It does eventually stop copying with
> an error, but it takes a good > > long while for ZFS to throw up that error,
> and even when it does, > > the pool doesn't report any problems at all.> >
> The delayed error report may be ok but the pool not reporting a > problem
> does not seem very ok.> > Bob> ======================================> Bob
> Friesenhahn> [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/>
> GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/>
_________________________________________________________________
Play and win great prizes with Live Search and Kung Fu Panda
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/101719966/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
