Erik Ableson wrote:
> Uhhh - for an unmanaged server you can use ESXi for free. Identical
> server functionality, just requires licenses if you need multiserver
> features (ie vMotion)

How does ESXi w/o vMotion, vSphere, and vCenter server stack up against
VMWare Server? My impression was that you need these other pieces to
make such an infrastructure useful?

>
> Cordialement,
>
> Erik Ableson 
>
> On 8 nov. 2009, at 19:12, Tim Cook <t...@cook.ms <mailto:t...@cook.ms>>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Joe Auty <j...@netmusician.org
>> <mailto:j...@netmusician.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     Tim Cook wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>         It appears that one can get more in the way of features out
>>>         of VMWare Server for free than with ESX, which is seemingly
>>>         a hook into buying more VMWare stuff.
>>>
>>>         I've never looked at Sun xVM, in fact I didn't know it even
>>>         existed, but I do now. Thank you, I will research this some
>>>         more!
>>>
>>>         The only other variable, I guess, is the future of said
>>>         technologies given the Oracle takeover? There has been much
>>>         discussion on how this impacts ZFS, but I'll have to learn
>>>         how xVM might be affected, if at all.
>>>
>>>
>>>     Quite frankly, I wouldn't let that stop you.  Even if Oracle
>>>     were to pull the plug on xVM entirely (not likely), you could
>>>     very easily just move the VM's back over to *insert your
>>>     favorite flavor of Linux* or Citrix Xen.  Including Unbreakable
>>>     Linux (Oracle's version of RHEL).
>>>
>>
>>     I remember now why Xen was a no-go from when I last tested it. I
>>     rely on the 64 bit version of FreeBSD for most of my VM guest
>>     machines, and FreeBSD only supports running as domU on i386
>>     systems. This is a monkey wrench!
>>
>>     Sorry, just thinking outloud here...
>>
>>
>>
>> I have no idea what it supports right now.  I can't even find a
>> decent support matrix.  Quite frankly, I would (and do) just use a
>> separate server for the fileserver than the vm box.  You can get
>> 64bit cpu's with 4GB of ram for awfully cheap nowadays.  That should
>> be more than enough for most home workloads.
>>
>> --Tim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> zfs-discuss mailing list
>> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org <mailto:zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org>
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss


-- 
Joe Auty
NetMusician: web publishing software for musicians
http://www.netmusician.org
j...@netmusician.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to