On 18/01/2010 08:59, Phil Harman wrote:
YMMV. At a recent LOSUG meeting we were told of a case where rsync was faster than an incremental zfs send/recv. But I think that was for a mail server with many tiny files (i.e. changed blocks are very easy to find in files with very few blocks).
After changes around build 114 (iirc) this shouldn't be the case anymore znd an incremental zfs send should always be able to at least match the performance of incremental rsync. Now with lots of files where only a small subset of them changes incremental zfs send should be much faster and that's my observation.
-- Robert Milkowski http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
