Joerg Schilling wrote:
Julian Regel <jrmailgate-zfsdisc...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
If you like to have a backup that allows to access files, you need a file based
backup and I am sure that even a filesystem level scan for recently changed
files will not be much faster than what you may achive with e.g. star.
Note that ufsdump directly accesees the raw disk device and thus _is_ at
filesystem leven but still is slower than star on UFS.
While I am sure that star is technically a fine utility, the problem is that it
is effectively an unsupported product.
From this viewpoint, you may call most of Solaris "unsupported".
what is that supposed to mean?
Michael
--
Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
