On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Sunil <funt...@yahoo.com> wrote: > ouch! My apologies! I did not understand what you were trying to say. > > I was gearing towards: > > 1. Using the newer 1TB in the eventual RAIDZ. Newer hardware typically means > (slightly) faster access times and sequential throughput. > 2. Getting the RAIDZ serviceable quick. Your method will cause two full copy > operations. Data will likely be copied to the same extent with my method but > it will become and remain available (almost) all the time (minus 1TB failing > on me during the transition). > --
probably you can take the second slice on 1tb offline after creating raidz pool to increase speed. -- O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
