On May 20, 2010, at 6:25 PM, Travis Tabbal <tra...@tabbal.net> wrote:
use a slog at all if it's not durable? You should
disable the ZIL
instead.
This is basically where I was going. There only seems to be one SSD
that is considered "working", the Zeus IOPS. Even if I had the
money, I can't buy it. As my application is a home server, not a
datacenter, things like NFS breaking if I don't reboot the clients
is a non-issue. As long as the on-disk data is consistent so I don't
have to worry about the entire pool going belly-up, I'm happy
enough. I might lose 30 seconds of data, worst case, as a result of
running without ZIL. Considering that I can't buy a proper ZIL at a
cost I can afford, and an improper ZIL is not worth much, I don't
see a reason to bother with ZIL at all. I'll just get a cheap large
SSD for L2ARC, disable ZIL, and call it a day.
For my use, I'd want a device in the $200 range to even consider an
slog device. As nothing even remotely close to that price range
exists that will work properly at all, let alone with decent
performance, I see no point in ZIL for my application. The
performance hit is just too severe to continue using it without an
slog, and there's no slog device I can afford that works properly,
even if I ignore performance.
Just buy a caching RAID controller and run it in JBOD mode and have
the ZIL integrated with the pool.
A 512MB-1024MB card with battery backup should do the trick. It might
not have the capacity of an SSD, but in my experience it works well in
the 1TB data moderately loaded range.
Have more data/activity then try more cards and more pools, otherwise
pony up the $$$$ for a capacitor backed SSD.
-Ross
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
