Also, let me note, it came with a 3 year warranty so I expect it to last at least 3 years...but if it doesn't, i'll just return it under the warranty.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Thomas Burgess <wonsl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Bob Friesenhahn < > bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote: > >> On Mon, 24 May 2010, Thomas Burgess wrote: >> >>> >>> It's a sandforce sf-1500 model but without a supercap....heres some info >>> on it: >>> >>> Maximum Performance >>> >>> * Max Read: up to 270MB/s >>> * Max Write: up to 250MB/s >>> * Sustained Write: up to 235MB/s >>> * Random Write 4k: 15,000 IOPS >>> * Max 4k IOPS: 50,000 >>> >> >> Isn't there a serious problem with these specifications? It seems that >> the minimum assured performance values (and the median) are much more >> interesting than some "maximum" performance value which might only be >> reached during a brief instant of the device lifetime under extremely ideal >> circumstances. It seems that toilet paper may of much more practical use >> than these specifications. In fact, I reject them as being specifications >> at all. >> >> The Apollo reentry vehicle was able to reach amazing speeds, but only for >> a single use. >> >> Bob >> > What exactly do you mean? > Every review i've read about this device has been great. Every review i've > read about the sandforce controllers has been good to....are you saying they > have shorter lifetimes? Everything i've read has made them sound like they > should last longer than typical ssds because they write less actual data.... > > > > >> -- >> Bob Friesenhahn >> bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, >> http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ >> GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ >> > >
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
