> > ----- Original Message ----- > > Victor, > > > > The zpool import succeeded on the next attempt > following the crash > > that I reported to you by private e-mail! > > > > For completeness, this is the final status of the > pool: > > > > > > pool: tank > > state: ONLINE > > scan: resilvered 1.50K in 165h28m with 0 errors on > Sat Jul 3 08:02:30 > > Out of curiosity, what sort of drives are you using > here? Resilvering in 165h28m is close to a week, > which is rather bad imho.
I think the resilvering statistic is quite misleading, in this case. We're using very average 1TB retail Hitachi disks, which perform just fine when the pool is healthy. What happened here is that the zpool-tank process was performing a resilvering task in parallel with the processing of a very large inconsistent dataset, which took the overwhelming majority of the time to complete. Why it actually took over a week to process the 2TB volume in an inconsistent state is my primary concern with the performance of ZFS, in this case. > > Vennlige hilsener / Best regards > > roy > -- > Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk > (+47) 97542685 > r...@karlsbakk.net > http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ > -- > I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum > presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært > imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv > anvendelse av idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de > fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante > synonymer på norsk. > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discu > ss -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
