On Jul 4, 2010, at 4:58 AM, Andrew Jones wrote:

> Victor,
> 
> The zpool import succeeded on the next attempt following the crash that I 
> reported to you by private e-mail! 

>From the threadlist it looked like system was pretty low on memory with stacks 
>of userland stuff swapped out, hence system was not responsive, but it was 
>able to complete inconsistent dataset processing in the end.

> 
> For completeness, this is the final status of the pool:
> 
> 
>  pool: tank
> state: ONLINE
> scan: resilvered 1.50K in 165h28m with 0 errors on Sat Jul  3 08:02:30 2010
> config:
> 
>        NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
>        tank        ONLINE       0     0     0
>          raidz2-0  ONLINE       0     0     0
>            c0t0d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
>            c0t1d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
>            c0t2d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
>            c0t3d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
>            c0t4d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
>            c0t5d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
>            c0t6d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
>            c0t7d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
>        cache
>          c2t0d0    ONLINE       0     0     0
> 
> errors: No known data errors
> 

Good. Run 'zpool scrub' to make sure there are no other errors.

regards
victor

> Thank you very much for your help. We did not need to add additional RAM to 
> solve this, in the end. Instead, we needed to persist with the import through 
> several panics to finally work our way through the large inconsistent 
> dataset; it is unclear whether the resilvering caused additional processing 
> delay. Unfortunately, the delay made much of the data quite stale, now that 
> it's been recovered.
> 
> It does seem that zfs would benefit tremendously from a better (quicker and 
> more intuitive?) set of recovery tools, that are available to a wider range 
> of users. It's really a shame, because the features and functionality in zfs 
> are otherwise absolutely second to none.
> 
> /Andrew[i][/i][i][/i][i][/i][i][/i][i][/i]
> -- 
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to