> Just a short question - wouldn't it be easier, and perhaps faster, to just > have the MySQL DB on an NFS share? iSCSI adds >complexity, both on the target and the initiator. Yes, we did tried both and we didn't notice any difference in term of performances. I've read conflicting opinions on which is best and the majority seems to say that iSCSI is better for databases, but I don't have any strong preference myself... Have you tried monitoring the I/O with vmstat or sar/sysstat? That should show the I/O speed as seen from Linux, and should be more relevant than the "real" I/O speed to/from the drives. Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 97542685 r...@karlsbakk.net http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ -- I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk.
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
