On Mon, August 16, 2010 11:01, Joerg Schilling wrote: > "David Dyer-Bennet" <d...@dd-b.net> wrote: > >> >> As such, they'll need to continue to comply with GPLv2 requirements. >> > >> > No, there is definitely no need for Oracle to comply with the GPL as >> they >> > own the code. >> >> Ray's point is, how long would BTRFS remain in the Linux kernel in that >> case? > > Such a license change can happen at any time. The Linux folks have no > grant > that it would not happen.
And they have every right to stop including BTRFS in the kernel whenever they wish. -- David Dyer-Bennet, d...@dd-b.net; http://dd-b.net/ Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/ Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/ Dragaera: http://dragaera.info _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
