Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 02:49 -0400 schrieb Fred Drake: > On 9/14/07, Christian Zagrodnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Before I'll revert the layer-support will be there in a third party > > package, probably using ++api++. > > Better to be specific than general when it's for a specific type of > request; why not ++xmlrpc++? > > Unless ++api++ is for more than XML-RPC support; perhaps it should be > for IHTTPRequest? > > I'd actually rather avoid a proliferation of ++namespace++ usages > myself, and prefer ++api++ for IHTTPRequest.
+1 -- gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstrasse 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 - fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
