On 14.09.2007, at 08:49, Fred Drake wrote:
On 9/14/07, Christian Zagrodnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Before I'll revert the layer-support will be there in a third party package, probably using ++api++.Better to be specific than general when it's for a specific type of request; why not ++xmlrpc++? Unless ++api++ is for more than XML-RPC support; perhaps it should be for IHTTPRequest? I'd actually rather avoid a proliferation of ++namespace++ usages myself, and prefer ++api++ for IHTTPRequest.
So you're suggesting using ++api++ to choose the request type for all IHTTPRequests. That's fine for me. I just wonder why I should remove the "skin" support for XML-RPC since that is just choosing the request type...
/me is confused. -- Christian Zagrodnick gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstrasse 29 · 06112 halle/saale www.gocept.com · fon. +49 345 12298894 · fax. +49 345 12298891
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
