-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
On 1/7/2010 7:31 AM, Nikash V. SINGH wrote:
> The similarities are FAR too coincidental, and unintentional or not,
> this issue needs to be addressed otherwise it could lead to legal
> issues, or more pressing from my point of view, it would compromise the
> integrity of the Art project.

I don't really see this as a major issue. At least in the States (and
I'm assuming its similar elsewhere), there could only be "legal
issues" of the similarity of the logos would tend to create confusion
in the minds of consumers. I don't think there's any way one could
make any realistic argument that such is the case here.


> Right now OOo is plagued with arbitrary Design motifs;
> - The mishaped gulls
> - The wireframe gulls (which are showing their age as Design elements)
> - The "reverse-s" which is used ad-hoc per design item
> - A "3" which appears every so often with no fixed location, scale or
typeface

I am totally on-board with you on these issues, however.

- -- 
Steven Shelton
Twilight Media & Design, LLC
17195 Silver Parkway
#134
Fenton, MI 48430
www.TwilightMD.com


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
 
iD8DBQFLRj/fKP0FWmSVanERAioUAKDkeYHS9ZfPCI4O1uX0r6v3FAHWtQCfRcYe
bYNbD6EqAPTj+6Az2AT9v0Q=
=uzaG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: art-unsubscr...@marketing.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: art-h...@marketing.openoffice.org

Reply via email to