"However, to suggest that the body of the writings left to use from 1921-57 period will be sufficient for 1957-2863+ period is a bit of stretch for me."
Dear Ahang, I agree. There is a lot of authoritative interpretation that could have been done which no longer will be. "What are the impacts on the scope of the House, the range of its infallibility, etc?" I can't see that it effects the scope or infallibility of the House as elucidated by Abdu'l-Baha one iota. It's the things the Guardian was supposed to do which we have now lost. warmest, Susan __________________________________________________ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, use subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Web - http://list.jccc.edu/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.net New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/bahai-st@list.jccc.edu
