I agree it is a very useful development. I am just wondering, since many standard ALE frequencies end with a ".5", what about using for example 14109.0 ?
On 10/30/07, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > First impressions are that Patrick has a very nice bit of software in > the new ALE400 mode on > > MultiPSK. > > > > This is another step down the road to a strong ARQ mode, and It would be > great to see a number of people > > Download and experiment with it. It can be found at: > > > > http://f6cte.free.fr/MULTIPSK_TEST_28_10_2007.ZIP > > > > > > I disagree with Bonnie and think that any experiments with the mode should > be done on > > The same ALE frequencies as are currently used since it is an opportunity > to skip back and forth to compare performance. > > > > There is nothing to be gained by moving off to some obscure frequency > since these > > Would not be monitored on a regular basis. By splintering the ALE > frequencies it > > Would discourage use of anything other than PCALE on 14109.5. > > > > Additionally , this would create sounding tones on a number of other > frequencies > > Which are or could be used for other modes. Since there is not a large > active > > ALE community ( emphasis on ACTIVE) all can, and should be able survive on > the current ALE frequencies. > > > > John > > VE5MU > > > > > > > -- Andy K3UK www.obriensweb.com (QSL via N2RJ)
