Then don't use it, Howard. But your lack of understanding the software doesn't mean it's useless, garbage, or...in your words....UNPROFESSIONAL.
I'm sure Patrick has seen the comments about what the UI looks like. I was one that MADE comments in the past. I was able to overcome the large amounts of buttons by simply executing the program one day and merely staring at the screen. I examined each and every button-off the air. Once you "walk around the neighborhood", you find your way around. And what you "give up" in beauty, you make up for in performance. Sure...some of us use other suites for different reasons. But MultiPSK is the ONLY one that includes as many modes as it does. fldigi comes close....but Multi is a swiss-army knife. KB2HSH --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Howard Z" <howar...@...> wrote: > > Hmmm, > > > Where the uninstaller? > Oh, he doesn't seem to have one. > I suppose he can't imagine anyone ever wanting to uninstall his software? > > This is the most unprofessional software I have ever seen. > > > Howard > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KH6TY <kh6ty@> wrote: > > > > Howard, once you get used to it, you can understand why there are so > > many buttons and colors (to try and group). Just concentrate on the QSO > > after you have pushed the button you need and it will not feel so > > unfriendly. There is more to Patrick's program than any other and it is > > hard to handle all those functions without deep menu structures. The use > > of buttons and changing button selections is clever and really > > appreciated once you get used to it. Multipsk is technically nearly > > perfect and I always come back to it if I have trouble with any other > > program (which may be simpler looking). > > > > 73 - Skip KH6TY > > Designer of DigiPan > > > > > > > > > > > > Howard Z wrote: > > > > > > > > > MultiPSK = Yick Ugg, can't stand to even look at the user interface. > > > > > > I don't care if his s/w can walk on water - I can't bring myself to > > > use it. > > > > > > The author of MultiPSK needs to think about all the other software he > > > uses, written by professionals, and consider how to make his own > > > software easy to use and pleasant to look at. > > > > > > Yes, I know others may have different opinions. > > > > > > Howard > > > > > > > > > > > >
