RE: filmscanners: NikonLS30 or CanoScan2710?

[Hornford, Dave]

I own a 2710 and didn't buy the LS-30 because of the price differential at the time. IIRC, it was $cdn880 vs $cdn1300-1700 (there were two Nikon's that were $cdn 500 apart I don't recall which one was the LS-30), and it came with PhotoShop LE, which I would have needed on the Nikon side (since then I took advantage of a deal between my employer and Adobe and upgraded)   In test scans of my slides they came out with results indistinguishable on my output (HP 895 or Web). My retailer sold both so I came in with some slides & a zip disk.   ICE would have been nice, but it is needed on so few of my slides it was not worth a 60% price increase. Had price been out of the running I'd have bought a Nikon scanner, simply for the addition of ICE and the track record Nikon has in these devices compared to Canon's.   regards Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jan Copier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 8:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: filmscanners: NikonLS30 or CanoScan2710? Hello,   I'm planning to buy a new scanner, my old one is a Nikon LS20.   Can anyone tell me what is the best choice, the Nikon LS30 or CanoScan2710?   Thanks for who is responding