On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, Ole Troan wrote:
The deployment challenge of that is that every router must support HNCP
and must support SADR.
Yes, there is indeed a problem here with incremental deployment.
That's why I think there might be upside in "homenet lite" which drops the
arbitrary topology requirement and keeps the "routed home" requirement,
but also brings with it the service discovery part. Perhaps it's an easier
chunk of code to deploy if vendors do not need to implement full homenet
but instead implement RFC7084 plus a few other things?
High level would be to use DHCPv6-PD, turning sub-router WAN firewall off
and enabling service discovery proxies, as I outlined in previous email.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
