yes.
virtual memorials are fine, and we could do an editathon in her name
as we did for Kevin,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/2016_Women_in_Philosophy_Drive
but i think we should organize some scholarships / stipends in her name.
i will raise this at Wikimedia DC
Yeah, if you wanted a case study of what implicit bias looks like, just
look at health care.
It is good working on disaster response, but the vital chronic public
health topics are relatively neglected.
This infant sleep article got elevated by our oclc friends. Much criticism
of the start by the
please include it in the GLAM newsletter, (deadline today)
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:26 PM, camelia boban
wrote:
> We shared it on our Milan wiki page event.
>
> Camelia
>
> Il 06 lug 2017 10:37, "Jacqueline Mabey"
> ha scritto:
>
>> Hi
volunteers
j
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 4:57 PM, J Hayes <slowki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the smaller wikis have ownership issues , the arguments are so vehement
> because the stakes are so small.
>
> i would advise trying out lots of other wikis like commons or wikisource
> or wikidata.
> I'd be happy to work with English majors and MLIS students at the
> University of Washington. I'm a former English major and teacher myself. :)
>
> On May 11, 2017, at 7:39 PM, J Hayes <slowki...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> i would nominate sadads, he's the digital humanist
&
i would nominate sadads, he's the digital humanist
but his plate is full
maybe a small grant
for a grad student of his choosing
or roping in womeninred / women in green
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org>
wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 7:12 PM
yes,
i have been writing poetry bios for a while
(and there is a bias in the historical data)
and transcribing on wikisource tends to be by book and not individual poem
(that tends to be an older practice)
the oclc metadata tends to be by book, so we may need some hand curation,
since we have
t to their attention and they didn't investigate it at all.
>
> Pine
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 6:19 AM, J Hayes <slowki...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> nope -
>> this was an incident at wikiconUSA 2015
>> apparently nothing done
>> which has impacted the credib
t would have the ability to investigate the situation.
>
> Pine
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:29 PM, J Hayes <slowki...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> yes, that functionary and his behavior on meta has chilled the
>> participation of some librarian editors
>> t
yes, that functionary and his behavior on meta has chilled the
participation of some librarian editors
they are highly skeptical of wiki harrassment efforts as long as he is in a
position to see personal identifying information.
they do not trust check user to be done responsibly as well
this is
oved on
> to something else.
>
> The last time I got templated by a patroller, I convinced him to write
> his first article, lol, it was a decent article too, and he even
> joined my WikiProject.
>
> On 4/12/17, J Hayes <slowki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > yes, i reme
the poor archiving of state department predates the change over
i did some link rot repair using archive.is but there may be lost years
we should think about a program of archiving state urls, since they will
not do it.
jim
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Ellie Kesselman
here is the archive .is page
https://archive.is/1XJm
internet archive not working
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Neotarf wrote:
> The U.S. government website for the International Women of Courage Award
> is down. There are probably quite a few articles that link to this
yeah- nominating VOA video for deletion is proof of the cultural bias - so
it goes
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Fæ wrote:
> Advocate for what exactly? There nothing ethically wrong in ensuring
> we establish precedent using an equal sample space rather than cases
> chosen
to know about that, and I'd be happy to pass that feedback along if it
>>> hasn't already been delivered.
>>>
>>> But is there any reason to believe that happened?
>>> Pete
>>> [[User:Peteforsyth]]
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 9:39 AM
yes and some time dilation
and taking pictures of people with user name tags on, so outing
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Pete Forsyth
wrote:
> This feature article from Bloomberg BusinessWeek does, IMO, a great job of
> exploring and contextualizing Wikipedia's
and a sense of
> entitlement wrapped in a defense of 'free speech'". Really makes you think…
>
> On Aug 23, 2016 9:23 PM, "J Hayes" <slowki...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes a little fallout from an Afc reviewer taken to ani
>> Why she was wasting her copy-
i see brainyj drove by tag-spamed it , 2 years ago
recently, they can't be bothered with AfD, especially with old material
they concentrate on biting new editors articles.
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Carol Moore dc
wrote:
> Dang, I should have found some refs
ok there your go
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waldrada_of_Wormsgau
rough translation of italian version
needs polish and leaning toward OR.
i see there was an article on her daughter
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Fæ wrote:
> Waldra became the wife of Lothar II in AD 862,
yes, i believe we have discussed this before-
there is a systemic bias in article subjects (including a sub-set of bios)
based on editor interest;
there is a systemic bias in the "reliable sources" which makes it harder to
address bias, by adding sources alone;
there is systemic bias with
i have copy pasted the discussion here
warning tl;dr
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:18 PM, wrote:
> I cannot read Facebook because their real name policy means I was banned
> (trans + harassers). Is this available anywhere else?
>
> Anna Johnson
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-benjamin-wey/
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Yes,
The sequence being:
Regina editathon
One inexperienced new page patroler mass delete
Ockerbloom Philly tweets
I Facebook to Wikipedia weekly
Group triage
A lesson learned would be nice
Cheers
On Mar 14, 2016 12:51 PM, "Neotarf" wrote:
> There is a lengthy thread about
it's hard to tell the privileged ignorance from the actively sexist.
ultimately motive does not matter.
the biting culture rejects what does not fit the stereotype
just as associate professor is a delete me sign, so is "feminist"
an editathon for newbies are SPA, and where one of the article
http://wmcspeechproject.com/
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
"the reaction would have been infinitely more severe if not for the name of
the author"
oh no, the reaction is because she is a women. commentators at signpost
care not of position, but they could be appalled that a woman is in a
position of responsibility. why waste a chance to sealion when
"Keilana's actions have encouraged people to make it less so. "
or validating the bad behavior elsewhere.
i'd just say they don't need no validation, they will continue the "buzz
saw" regardless.
this language appropriation, (like sl**-walking) is a common enough device
to be cliché. shouldn't
risker:
i'm kinda with you about defining deviancy down
it's just that things are so bad can't go lower
article subjects are already dismayed by the opaque unfriendly culture
they periodically ask for article deletion
librarians are advised about the "cultural buzzsaw"
having a safe environment
fyi: second in a planned series of discussions on meta
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Harassment_workshop
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
would seem if they are now
> deceased it would be possible to find a fair-use image. Complete notes and
> links, as well as links to existing articles are at:
> https://neotarf.wordpress.com/2016/01/25/lists-of-notable-deaths-of-2015/
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 2:59 PM, J Hayes <sl
i should not imagine a fear of paid notices, should prevent a systematic
inclusion of NYTimes obits, which are assumed notable.
especially with the reference generator doing all the formatting.
no one is doing this; the article mentions 25% female among these. i.e. we
don't include reliable
some obits are not behind paywall.
a reference to do list would make good work.
maybe we could get Mietchen or Magnus to make an automated list article /
category "list of people with obituaries"
cheers
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Neotarf wrote:
> Links to lists in
/more complex system than simply the editorial powers-that-be. You'd
> have to also consider what drives families to pay for death notices for
> some people more than others.
>
> -Pete
> [[User:Peteforsyth]]
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 6:07 PM, J Hayes <slowki...@gmail.com>
http://wappp.hks.harvard.edu/event/wappp-research-seminar-designing-gender-equality-iris-bohnet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEnzI31kNy4=youtu.be=PL9D7F37590143D22E
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription
there is a recent blog post about workgroup at Berkman Center for Internet
and Society
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/12/03/working-together-on-online-harassment/
this was an old column from last year
the same writer did a nice column recently about the fund raising.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at
yes, sorry we go to "sofixit" reflexively, event organizers are thin on the
ground
National Library of Scotland had a wikipedian in residence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/National_Library_of_Scotland
i would encourage you to get with your local library special collection,
use some
i agree the trend is low undergraduate attendance if not part of grade
some campus marketing (fliers, partnership with groups seems in order)
but we don't have a handle on it.
major divide between readers and editors seems hard to close.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Pine W
the point about dying with a whimper is well taken;
or as Andrew Lih said: become like wikinews, a failed wiki
the librarian who said "cultural buzzsaw", also said, "would not touch
wikipedia with a 10 foot pole."
apparently, the write an article outside wiki to provide negative feedback
to the
feel free to correct about Clara H. Hasse not Nellie A. Brown, and
there were a handful of women contributors at EB1911
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Author:Agnes_Mary_Clerke
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica/Contributors
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Kevin
:
> https://neotarf.wordpress.com/2015/10/19/danielle-citrons-wikicon-online-harassment-speech-qa/
> and added links to the documents referenced.
>
> @Fae thanks for the link, I didn't know you could link to a specific point
> in a video
> @J Hayes "cultural buzzsaw" tweet?
>
yes, notice crickets on talk page
you could be dismissive of the questions as the usual "gender gap cabal",
but when andrew lih says that is the perception of the culture among
library professionals, and it needs to change,
you would think good faith arbs would sit up and take notice.
but as DGG
bout-us/Pages/code-conduct-value-ethics.aspx#h
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:52 PM, J Hayes <slowki...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> right,
>> here's the tweet from an audience member at a ARL conference
>> https://twitter.com/LibSkrat/status/651786423138430976
>>
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/oct/11/female-technology-journalists-abuse-zoe-quinn?CMP=twt_a-media_b-gdnmedia
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
yes,
nice for arbcom to see how they are perceived
and Andrew Lih mentioned the "cultural buzzsaw" tweet for importance of
fixing culture as one of the things wikipedia must do.
this was for an audience of the US powers that be; it will be interesting
to see the impact on future conduct.
On
rupert,
i and carol have a somewhat different experience with the police. it is
unclear if i would trust them to keep identity confidential. WMF should act
regardless of legal status. this merry go round of not providing clear
lines of responsibility and action (other than round file) is part of
a section on DD is all you need to know about wikipedia.
i see no mention on Red Scare; Sputnik; or
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Society_for_the_Suppression_of_Vice
needs a complete rewrite, but won't be happening any time soon.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Marie Earley
clearly he needs an invite to
wikiconference USA
maybe a paper presentation
http://wikiconferenceusa.org/wiki/Category:Submissions/2015
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net
wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-08-19/Op-ed
i agree not coding
especially with visual editor
i look at it as another tool in the box for social media outreach
for archivists and librarians and digital humanists
pushing content to where researchers can find it.
also broad principles of crowd sourcing, and open source software of crowd
maybe a note to leigh themadattar User:Thelmadatter?
who was mentioned in a blog
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/04/13/wiki-learning-edit-a-thon-mexico/
good reason to go to wikimania
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Neotarf neot...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone know what's going on with the
i also collected some anecdotal data about deletions and speedy deletions
of MacArthur Fellows.
you could study differential deletions of them or Fellows of the Royal
Society.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
Emilio - thanks for the reminder of that
t think they were referring to this deletion discussion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pia_Ednie-Brown
and this declined AfC
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jennifer_Taylor_%28architect%29oldid=650496415
the list shows a lot of positive work done
On
nice wiki-splaining - the problem with your thesis:
*What we don't need, however, is more feminists.*
is labeling and the double standard of civility enforcement
as Djembayz said at Signpost:
the rules on Wikipedia are not clear, the enforcement on disruptive
behavior is arbitrary or
you can also do a bot request here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_requests
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:09 PM, JJ Marr jjm...@gmail.com wrote:
You should ask down at the village pump, then if the response is
favorable, start a BRFA.
On Feb 24, 2015 10:04 PM, Maia Weinstock
http://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/newsroom/newsn/3431?utm_source=twitterutm_medium=cpcutm_content=STEMutm_campaign=emba
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
yes, Wikimedia DC was using some opt in tracking of editathons outcomes.
and reporting activity in annual report
http://wikimediadc.org/wiki/Annual_report_%282012%E2%80%932013%29
there are some case studies at GLAM wiki
were 'feminists'. They were just defending the mainstream point of view
from an endless onslaught of 8channers. The feminist point view isn't even
represented in the article.
On Jan 23, 2015, at 7:14 PM, J Hayes slowki...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jan/23
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jan/23/wikipedia-bans-editors-from-gender-related-articles-amid-gamergate-controversy
http://internet.gawker.com/wikipedia-purged-a-group-of-feminist-editors-because-of-1681463331/+cushac
___
Gendergap mailing
HASTAC blog post
http://www.hastac.org/blogs/alicia-pileggi/2015/01/16/woman-wikiworld-0
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
http://time.com/3666135/sheryl-sandberg-talking-while-female-manterruptions/
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/01/the-secret-to-smart-groups-isnt-smart-people/384625/
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
i concur
we need to be open to people, and team with them based on conduct
this remark tends to play into the negative stereotype, which is not what
we are about.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Leigh Honeywell le...@hypatia.ca wrote:
Tim, this kind ofsnippiness is inappropriate and
61 matches
Mail list logo