Hi
using a chatGPT API Perl module (
https://dev.to/davorg/writing-a-cpan-module-that-talks-to-chatgpt-gb5 ) with
ASSP
to check every single email (chatgpt plus account should be required) could be
an idea ?
Graziano
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp
Hi
I have this issue too , using
Centos 7.9 , Perl 5.36.0 , ASSP b22293
however apparently all is working ok in ASSP (all DNS checks are working)
Hi all,
I'm running ASSP on CENTOS 7, with Perl 5.30.1. I recently upgraded from b22137
to b22318.
Shortly afterwards, I'm seeing a new error
I would never read this, without words, thank you for all Fritz Borgstedt .
Graziano
--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS
?
Thank you
Graziano
--
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your
the local sender
Thank you
Graziano
--
Own the Future-Intelreg; Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest.
Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game
] 173.213.65.248 v...@ccs.in to:
g...@oj.com [spam found][blocked] -- SPF fail -- [Are you eligible? find out
now.] - /usr/local/assp/spam/id-36128-03377.eml;
if ValidateSPF is set to score I have zero email blocked with the behavior
above
SPFsoftfail is set to 1
Graziano
2.98(13040) works correctly, thank you
Graziano
Hello
recently using rebuildspamdb 2.9.4.0 (1.0.01) in various servers I have seen
this behavior executing it
Maxbytes:
Maxfiles:
rebuildspamdb is not able to extract values from assp.cfg , so using null
Maxbytes and Maxfiles values
is not good .
I replicate the issue in various perl versions, which could be the cause ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
and get
Hello Fritz
I have seen in 1.9.8.4 delaySpamLovers has been removed.
It was useful to enable/disable delaying for email or domain , a lot of people
is asking it.
Currently I can't see a way to enable delaying per email/domain as before. Any
chance to have it again ?
Graziano
indeed X-Assp-Envelope-From: is empty
is it a good/bad idea to show in ASSP log the From: value in case of the
envelope sender is not specified/empty ?
Graziano
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schrei
bt:
From: Email Marketing wil...@emkt2.galafassi.net
ASSP
header the from is clearly specified for example for the email
above it was the following
From: Email Marketing wil...@emkt2.galafassi.net
Thank you
Graziano
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event
Hello
will 5.10 be strictly required , or the usage of an old perl (5.8) will cause
only limitation
to some new feature ?
Thank you
Graziano
After 6 years we will require Perl 5.10 instead of Perl 5.8. Starting
with 1.9.8 (development
Savings!] - /usr/local/assp/okmail/Sale_Specials_New_Savings__411.eml;
seeks...@download-college.com and 83.167.236.63 are not local , why ASSP is
passing the email with [LocalOK] ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
Live Security
indeed the email contains this string with local
one choice for locals looking
Graziano
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schrei
bt:
/usr/local/assp/okmail/S
Forget my first respone.
There is a cosmetic bug, because ASSP is seeing a local string
*@mypoints.com,domaina.com^1332743748
will be accepted ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers
Hello
I noticed that the email in /spam folder ASSP replaces the From in the email
with the Return Path.
That is confusing to some, is there any ASSP setting to avoid this ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
Live Security Virtual
I checked now and the email below are in whitelist now . As it seems the
email/domain reported
using assp-white@ are not added instantly to the whitelist file .
Please after which event or time the email/domain are added to whitelist file ?
Thank you
Graziano
Hello
I am trying to add
*@adlinkd.it *@adlinke.net;
Jun-28-12 08:42:50 Email: whitelist addition: *@adlinkd.it;
Jun-28-12 08:42:50 Email: whitelist addition: *@adlinke.net;
If I check the /usr/local/assp/whitelist file there is not trace of
*@adlinkd.it and *@adlinke.net
Thank you
Graziano
functionality
was added to SSL_version so that it now needs to check the syntax and
rejects bad values.
You might fix the issue for you if you delete any references to SSL_version
from assp/assp.pl
Thank you
Graziano
to fix the issue I installed IO::Socket:SSL 1.68 from the source
Now if I
with 1.9.x ASSP seems to run correctly also with 1.68 , however it crashes with
1.70
Thomas Thats great but what about 1.9.x users?
On May 9, 2012, at 2:37 AM, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
Hi all,
before you upgrade IO::Socket::SSL to a version higher than 1.66 you must
upgrade ASSP to a build
Hello
with IO::Socket::SSL module version 1.70 ASSP fails with this error
invalid SSL_version specified at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/SSL.pm line 308
Using 1.9.6.9(0.0.04)
I tried disabling TLS (enableSSL=0) but ASSP refuses to start .
Graziano
installed;
and it starts correctly !? (really weird)
Graziano
Hello
with IO::Socket::SSL module version 1.70 ASSP fails with this error
invalid SSL_version specified at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/IO/Socket/SSL.pm line 308
Using 1.9.6.9(0.0.04)
I tried disabling TLS (enableSSL=0
)
In this case , if BayesLocal is enabled and some email or domain are entered in
yesBayesian_local,
the BayesLocal will be applied only for this list . Probably is more useful
than having current
noBayesian_local .
Graziano
Hello
when I send request to assp-white@ I receive an email with an empty body
message.
I have seen the problem also using assp-spam@ .
Thank you
Graziano
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event
of their
frequency will be used to validate incoming addresses. Note:
LocalAddresses_Flat or DoLDAP or DoVRFY must be enabled.
Thank you
Graziano
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell
The problem fixed itself after today I applied an EXIM upgrade , even if it's
weird since with older
ASSP versions 1.8.1.7(0.0.00) and older it was working .
Graziano
I tried older ASSP versions and I found this
current version 1.9 does not work
...
... other tested no works
...
1.8.5.9
same problem with latest 1.9.6.7(0.0.06)
Graziano
Hello
using 1.9.6.5(0.0.05)
The email below (local good email) is going in black hole , never reaches MTA
and disconnects after 0 seconds (?).
.dat is allowed in GoodAttach
Apr-13-12 11:55:45 id-33433-00011 [Attachment] 127.0.0.1info
version which passes the email below is 1.8.5.9(0.0.06) .
After 1.8.5.9(0.0.06) there is NO ASSP version
which is able to pass the email below to MTA .
Graziano
also using noprocessing I can't find a way to pass this email to MTA .
i...@jancr.com and ro...@ciam.com are local email . The email
Hello
today I found a localdomain (domain listed in localdomains) listed in
DomainBoxLimit (probably added because the domain sent spoofed email ?).
Could be avoided this behavior (having a localdomain added in DomainBoxLimit) ?
Thank you
Graziano
in
whiteListedIPs, noProcessingIPs ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net
also denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways .
using ASSP 1.9.6.x
Graziano
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Could it be possible to have the behavior above also for
denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways , or at least for ips listed in
whiteListedIPs, noProcessingIPs ?
It is possible to change the code to do
- sent DATA size: 48.04
kByte;
Apr-13-12 11:55:45 id-33433-00011 127.0.0.1 info@jancr to: ro...@ciam.com
disconnected (0 seconds);
Thank you
Graziano
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first
10:51:01 id-33352-36648 [ForgedHELO] 176.9.71.162
off...@account1.cc to: ho...@account2.st [spam found][blocked] --
ForgedHELO:'www3.server.st' -- [Kündigung UPC];
Thank you
Graziano
--
Better than sec? Nothing
in myServerRe I have a list (txt file) of local server ip addresses . In each
list there are different ips .
The problem should not be in myServerRe , probably a duplicate in localdomains
I will see .
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schrei
bt:
and ASSP is
-21696 189.57.226.93
prvs=432277adc=talita.nica...@bradescoseguros.com.br to: t...@myemail.com
disconnected (1333409587 seconds);
the email never reaches the customer inbox. Also I dont understand those
1333409587 seconds .
Thank you
Graziano
...@bradescoseguros.com.br to: t...@myemail.com
disconnected ;
Graziano
Hello
a weird behavior in 1.9.6.5(0.0.5)
root@netserver [~]# grep id-33340-21696 /usr/local/assp/maillog.txt
Apr-02-12 20:31:33 id-33340-21696
189.57.226.93prvs=432277adc=talita.nica...@bradescoseguros.com.br info:
found message size
Hello
a russian admin reported me that the problem with xn--80adjztkde5i.xn which was
fixed some week ago
Mar-28-12 20:43:50 id-33295-00995 [RelayAttempt] 193.200.173.218
w...@shram.kiev.ua relay attempt blocked for:
a.ignat...@xn--80adjztkde5i.xn;
now returned in 1.9.6.4(0.0.03)
Graziano
score is not honored ?
I have also
maxBayesValues 45
baysProbability 0.6
baysConf 0
(Also the nospamtag after an email blocked in this way has been reported not
working) .
Graziano
--
This SF email is sponsosred
id-33284-03343 [MessageScore] 67.228.50.51
bounces+40111-c106-andreas.philippi=cubu...@sendgrid.info to:
andreas.phili...@cubu.ro [spam found][blocked] -- totalscore(56) over
MessageScoringUpperLimit -- [Anuntul tau pe jobber];
Thank you
Graziano
module not working correctly ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
___
Assp
to older ASSP
version and
the problem is the same. Even if ASSP is reporting all perl modules are
installed ,
I think there should be some perl issue in the server.
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
file:files/relayhosts
Where did you put that file
in whitelist file, a more efficient whitelist
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
These are all spammer which where is some mailing list , and were
automatically added to whitelist
when the mailing list was send out from a local user .
Did you try
ok trying newer
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
If I use MaxWhitelistDays to have the whitelist smaller with a low
value I risk to remove from whitelist some email
which were entered using email interface, and I want avoid
you
Graziano
--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
___
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test
, should go in
/usr/local/assp/whitelist
however this email contacts should not be 100% white such as surewhitelist ,
these could be scored with a negative score , i.e. -20
What do you think ?
Graziano
--
This SF
my fault , sorry!. I checked the email headers for some email and there was
always a logic explanation ,
whitelistdb (even if it's strange these email are in whitelistdb because these
are all spammers) .
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
I can
in noLogLineRe I have default
max errors|collect
now I set it to empty , I will see
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
my fault , sorry!. I checked the email headers for some email and
there was always a logic explanation ,
whitelistdb (even
at all .
I am using same assp.cfg used in other servers , however I am not experiencing
the issues of this server.
Graziano
--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu
BTW ASSP is filtering email in this server , I counted 11764 email blocked in
current log .
However there is a low amount of email which is passing with no check at all .
npsize is set to 50 , so the email in the example below should be processed.
Graziano
Hello
I have a server running
...@moelfar.com.br disconnected (1 seconds);
I can find these easily grepping the disconnected (1 seconds) rows . These
are going in inbox and very often are spam.
Graziano
BTW ASSP is filtering email in this server , I counted 11764 email blocked in
current log .
However there is a low amount
...@alia.it Message-Score: added 53 for Bayesian Probability: 1.0, total
score for this message is now 97;
why 53 instead of 43 ? Is it due to the new baysProbability ? If yes how should
be set baysProbability to be sure to have always the baysValencePB 43 used.
Thank you
Graziano
Bayesian Check [scoring:42] - Prob: 0.99976 = spam;
42 instead of 43 with baysConf 0 , baysProbability 0.6 (?)
Graziano
Hello
Even if I have baysValencePB set to 43 I have my log full of rows like this
Mar-15-12 05:36:59 id-33180-19851 59.95.38.65g...@wikipedia.org to:
d...@alia.it
When I upgraded to 1.9.6.3 I found the value to 0.000
I was thinking it was like having 0 , but it was not .
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
as it seems it's related with Bayesian Confidence Threshold (baysConf)
baysConf is set per default
after reading all in Bayesian docs , I can't understand If I have a possibility
to score exactly
baysValencePB value in all situations , I understood there is no way now.
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
even if I received this too
Mar-15-12 05
Hello
I am receiving various rows with this error
Mar-15-12 08:49:20 FSabort: done Expected 250, got: 451 Temporary local problem
- please try later;
smtp sessions are increasing (normally 2/3 now 12 and over)
Graziano
in securiteinfo.hdb the problem stopped.
Graziano
Hello
I am receiving various rows with this error
Mar-15-12 08:49:20 FSabort: done Expected 250, got: 451 Temporary local
problem - please try later;
smtp sessions are increasing (normally 2/3 now 12 and over)
Graziano
is sending email
correctly
Thank you
Graziano
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL
negative scores (in
the case above I am using mydomain.com=-0.5) ; I prefer this way instead to
use 2 separate files
(SpamFriends/spamFoes).
Graziano
--
Virtualization Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud
to find bottleneck/delay in filter processing , DNS ...
This data could be saved also in stats , to know which is the avg connection
time in server.
Thank you
Graziano
--
Virtualization Cloud Management Using Capacity
-33112-00222 [Bayesian] 98.138.89.233
emilioseill...@yahoo.com.ar to: p...@7ffp.com [spam found][blocked] --
Bayesian -- [Ruedas Sillas] - /usr/local/assp/spam/33112-00222.eml;
such as having DoBayesian:=1 , which could be the cause ?
Graziano
Hello
if a domain is listed in DomainBox, the email bounces offering the nospamtag ,
but if the sender resend
using the notspamtag, ASSP does not honor the nospamtag (DomainBox continues to
block the sender). It happens in 1.9.6.2(0.0.04)
Graziano
p.s. I was not able to replicate again
trying it now 0.0.05 .
In 0.0.04 there is a problem with NOTSPAMTAG too.
Even if I set a custom NotSpamTag , SpamError generates the bounced message
replaces NOTSPAMTAG with default 424242 instead of value set in NotSpamTag
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Hello
I have a server which is crashing and restarting all day with this error
Mar-02-12 14:29:00 Terminating ASSP: mainloop exception: Out of memory during
large request for 16781312 bytes, total sbrk() is 192815104 bytes at
/usr/local/assp/assp.pl line 28259.;
Graziano
) .
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
192815104 bytes
Did you realize what size the mail here is ?
--
Virtualization Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud
I am trying some version ago , exactly the 1.9.5.1(0.0.08) , and it's not
crashing. Also the number
of smtp session decreased from 30-40 to under 15-25 . I will leave it running
some hour.
Graziano
no , before the error there are email with no attachment. However there is a
huge attachment
.
Graziano
Set maxRealSizeExternal to a reasonable value.
--
Virtualization Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing
address in
denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways
Graziano
--
Virtualization Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing computing
am sure the smtp connections is bad , a fast way to block it
immediately could be useful too
Also a button to stop/start the automatic refresh in the smtp connection list
could be useful.
all IMHO
Graziano
- could be useful having from contact which are local in
green (i.e.) color remote
Hello
when I click maxBayesValues to reset to default the value goes to 30 .
However in description I read
Default is '60', minimum is '30'. Which is default 30 or 60 ? Reading the
description I understood
60 is better and it's should be default, am I correct ?.
Thank you
Graziano
have gmail,yahoo in noBlackDomain) ?
Graziano
--
Virtualization Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered
block all domain in show limit box with a value greater than n (I
can't find a way to do it) ?
does CleanPBInterval works also for Show domain box and show limit box ?
Graziano
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current
my fault I had PenaltyBox IP Scoring to 0
I set to 10 and It started to fill
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
should I set something to populate
/usr/local/assp/pb/pbdb.limit.db ?
it's not filling too .
It should fill. It is filling here with 1.9.6.0
after
this point I wait about 100 seconds and
it goes in timeout . Any idea which could be the cause ?
Graziano
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library
probably it
could be useful.
But using the limits below and using ip blackbox is probably useless
(nothing will go in blackdomains).
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
could you consider a blackbox for domain too ?
possible situation : often
ok trying 1.9.6.0(0.0.02) now
(V1)
I have started to implement that approach.
Look for PenaltyBox Database (pbdb), there are two new buttons:
show domains
show limits
Both dbs will add scores and increase a counter for ScoringLimit and
other events which has the third value set in the
ScoringLimit
In the line above 121 points were collected using some of the new + ValencePB
options ,
I set in Scoring settings , is it correct ?
Thank you
Graziano
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow
the log and the empty logs were caused by bombSubjectRe .
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
In ShowBlackBox I have a long list of ScoringLimit rows
like this
109.96.3.2501328081566 1328081570 4 121 109.96.3.250 ScoringLimit
In the line above
a blackbox for domain which put
the email in blackdomain after n totalized score (similar to blackbox for
ips).
Graziano
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning
Hello
what do you think to have in addition to maxSMTPdomainIPWL
also a Do Not Limit Different IP numbers For localDomains 0/1 ?
Graziano
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online
Hello
in spamFriends I have
@domain.net=1.0
in friendsValencePB I have -10
However in log I see this
added 10 for SpamFriends
should it not be -10 ?
Graziano
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow
I found that puny code can be converted in normal text
http://www.charset.org/punycode.php
so xn8sb1agmz became т-лайн which means T-Online
and if you enter XN--4-8SB1AGM.XN--P1AI in browser it open http://4лайн.рф/
Graziano
ok , in fact I replied to customer that ASSP allows valid top
ASSP allow an email like t...@xn8sb1agmz.xn ?
Graziano
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio
(currently noprocessing does not
allow them to pass) .
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
Can ASSP allow an email like t...@xn8sb1agmz.xn ?
xn is not
--
Try before you
.
equal does not seem to be accepted .
Graziano
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
___
Assp-test
I didn't know them; however the BlackRe trick seems to be better to me because
you can set a customized +/- per each domain, while friendsValencePB
and foesValencePB can have only 1 value common to all domains.
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt
thank you trying latest now (trying also spamFriends and spamFoes)
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
And could be possible to decide what should be collected in BlackBox?
For example I would collect only
MessageScoring|InvalidAddress|MissingMXA
baysValencePB
blValencePB
and so on .
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
And could be possible to decide what should be collected in BlackBox?
For example I would collect only
MessageScoring|InvalidAddress|MissingMXA|ForgedHELO
It is posssible to set two
using 1.9.5.9(0.0.01) , now 42|0 is accepted
184.154.137.1141326745348 1326745350 3 43 184.154.137.114 ScoringLimit
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
However this way seems to be complicated
Not to me
testing
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
Could be possible to collect in BlackBox all the ips which surpassed
the MessageScoring Upper Limit too ?
- msValencePB
--
RSA(R)
Hello
Could be possible to collect in BlackBox all the ips which surpassed the
MessageScoring Upper Limit too ?
And could be possible to decide what should be collected in BlackBox? For
example I would collect only
MessageScoring|InvalidAddress|MissingMXA|ForgedHELO .
Thank you
Graziano
by InvalidAddress could be blocked by PB extreme too
failry soon.
Graziano
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Mar 27 - Feb 2
Save $400 by Jan. 27
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
value)
MessagScoringUpperLimit
Currently I can't see a way to do it using the PB menu.
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
Could be possible to collect in BlackBox all the ips which surpassed
the MessageScoring Upper Limit too ?
And could
bayesian for outgoing.
Graziano
--
Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011
Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for
developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure
with 0.0.05, ASSP is very slow to receive an attachment.
Graziano
thank you, this explain the different behavior.
All seems to be ok now with maxsize except of now I am seeing another prob ,
always with attachments.
look this (from smtp connection list)
209.85.215.181mail-ey0-f181
...@dk.net
error: message exceeds maxSize 927.73 kByte (size)!) [test] -
/usr/local/assp/notspam/3-00048.eml;
testing asspblock@ now
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
in the smtp connection list . Tested 3 times in 1.9.5.0(0.0.13
has baysValencePB_error and spamdberror been removed in latest devs ?
Graziano
Thank you I think it will be useful, especially if someone do not want set
bayesian equal to MessageScoringUpperLimit . Testing it
There is new feature in 1.9.5.0 (0.0.10).
(Needs rebuildspamdb 2.9.5.0
to
use baysValencePB to 46
to have the same effects (with the risk to block some good email however).
Graziano
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
has baysValencePB_error and spamdberror been removed in latest devs ?
Yes, not useful
552 message exceeds MAXSIZE byte (size)
ASSP development mailing listassp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
schreibt:
The error that the other server returned was: 500 500 Mail appears to
be unsolicited -- send error reports to r...@hostnamey.net (state 18).
maxSizeError is set to what?
thank you , but where can I find it , I am following this
http://assp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/assp/assp/assp.pl?view=log
and there is only 1.9.5.1(0.0.04)
Graziano
Please use the latest developer version 1.9.5.1(0.0.05
announcement: 1.91 MByte;
Nov-24-11 08:44:43 id-32214-8 212.52.84.112 d...@libero.it error: message
exceeds maxSize 927.73 kByte!;
in this case also the bounced email is correct , in fact I read this in the
bounced email
SMTP protocol diagnostic: 552 message exceeds 927.73 kByte
Graziano
1 - 100 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
