Re: [beagleboard] putty black screen

This means you're unable to connect via puTTY to the Beaglebone. Now, there are several reasons why this can be, and you're going to have to figure that out on your own. Google should be a good source of information for this. On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 3:55 PM Meric wrote: > hi guys i have a issue

Re: [beagleboard] How to make can0 work

By the way "1F334455#1122334455667788" doesn't look like a valid J1939 packet. But I barely know that particular protocol. On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 4:15 PM William Hermans wrote: > Without any code, or steps you've taken. No one can help, or say what's > going on. I will say

Re: [beagleboard] How to make can0 work

Without any code, or steps you've taken. No one can help, or say what's going on. I will say this however. I wrote in a relatively short period of time( with help! From multiple sources). Software that could communicate over CANBUS that was able to decode information from a "TRACE"

Re: [beagleboard] How to make can0 work

J1939 bit positioning -> https://photos.app.goo.gl/7X24xgY8dR1aYTHDA On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:45 PM William Hermans wrote: > Oh forgot to mention. You'd need to use socketCAN. Perhaps this guy will > give you some ideas. > https://fabiobaltieri.com/2013/07/23/hacking-into-a-veh

Re: [beagleboard] How to make can0 work

Oh forgot to mention. You'd need to use socketCAN. Perhaps this guy will give you some ideas. https://fabiobaltieri.com/2013/07/23/hacking-into-a-vehicle-can-bus-toyothack-and-socketcan/ On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:40 PM William Hermans wrote: > For the record, you do not have to wait for ker

Re: [beagleboard] How to make can0 work

For the record, you do not have to wait for kernel 5.4 to do J1939. I wrote software using kernel 3.8.x that read a hybrid NIMEA 2000 protocol, which uses the same high level protocol as J1939. All you have to do is understand J1939, and bit wrangle . . . On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 7:33 AM Robert

Re: [beagleboard] use mass storage to send files from host to device

I'm not sure what's going on with g_multi for you there. But I will say this. There are other, probably better suited options for moving files over to the device. I've used g_multi in the past and have always found it problematic for this platform. So personally, I dedicated a cheap netbook to

Re: [beagleboard] How to configure extra USB gadgets on BBB?

https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/usb/gadget_multi.rst On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 1:48 AM Andrew P. Lentvorski wrote: > Is there a way to configure extra USB gadget endpoints in addition to the > BBB default ones or do I just have to go in and edit the am335x_evm.sh > script? > > Thanks. > >

Re: [beagleboard] BeagleBone Black SRM released from asciidoc version on wiki

Wow, what board is your hand model holding ? Can't tell. Every time I look at the opening picture. My eye goes straight to those bright red fingernails . . . Just sayin` On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 3:00 PM Jason Kridner wrote: > I've updated >

Re: [beagleboard] libgpiod on Beaglebone AI

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:46 AM Drew Fustini wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:48 PM John Allwine > wrote: > > > > That was it! gpioget gpiochip3 10 worked. > > It would be interesting to know if libgpiod proves fast enough for > your application. It has C++ and Python bindings that allow

Re: [beagleboard] how to access GPIO on Beaglebone AI via /dev/mem

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:59 AM John Allwine wrote: > I'm happy to leave the pinmux alone, but if all I'm doing is reading or > writing to the GPIO can I do so from /dev/mem? > > According to this post, it's about 1000x faster: > http://chiragnagpal.com/examples.html > > It's also how

Re: [beagleboard] Re: BeagleBone AI is here!

All you need is some air flow over the board/heatsinks. I just stick mine in front of a 20" box fan and it's fine. I'd assume a much smaller house fan would work fine as well. On Tue, Nov 5, 2019, 9:07 AM wrote: > Just bought one from Mouser few days ago, and experiencing overheating > issue

Re: [beagleboard] BBONE-AI - Operating Temp Min & Max

I've just got my AI sitting in front of a 20" box fan(on low) I have running 24/7 anyhow debian@beaglebone:~$ uptime 15:13:17 up 12 days, 9:30, 3 users, load average: 0.23, 0.15, 0.10 debian@beaglebone:~$ cat /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone*/temp 53400 53800 54600 53000 53800 Anyway, not sure

Re: [beagleboard] Re: BeagleBone AI is here!

Mine is on the way. On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:16 PM Mala Dies wrote: > Hello, > > I saw that yesterday online at Mouser. Today, the email showed up. Nice! > > Seth > > P.S. I think you guys out-did yourselves. We shall see. Time to save a bit > and then splurge on a nice, new board. Yea boy! >

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Can this beaglebone AI run raspbian OS?

William Hermans wrote: > There is absolutely zero point to running "rasbian" on any beagle > hardware. None of the software that is used for interacting with the > outside world would work. Granted, networking should work, USB connectivity > may work depending. > > As s

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Can this beaglebone AI run raspbian OS?

There is absolutely zero point to running "rasbian" on any beagle hardware. None of the software that is used for interacting with the outside world would work. Granted, networking should work, USB connectivity may work depending. As stated several times. Rasbian is just RaspberryPI(hardware)

Re: [beagleboard] Indiegogo launched using BeagleBone AI for private, trusted NAS

Potential Downside. What will availability be for us normal "joes" ? On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 9:42 AM Jason Kridner wrote: > This looks interesting to me as it provides a trusted, open-source > software/hardware solution for network-accessible storage: > > https://privacysafe.ai/ > >

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Where to order the BeagleBone AI?

ied to this, but I don't see it > > Price will be around US$100, not including any related tariffs. > > You know what, it was on a totally dumb thread name about Raspbian where > the price question shouldn't have been asked. > > On Tuesday, September 17, 2019 at 3:28:27 PM UTC-

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Where to order the BeagleBone AI?

price ? On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:24 AM Jason Kridner wrote: > No pre-orders. Orders available soon. > > On Tuesday, September 10, 2019 at 12:22:26 PM UTC-4, dee...@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> can we preorder? >> >> On Thursday, September 5, 2019 at 1:09:06 AM UTC+2, Jason Kridner wrote: >>> >>>

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Cape Manager for U-Boot

I've noticed that sometimes the order in which you load device files can play a factor on if they will load or not. May be worth checking out. On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 8:52 AM wrote: > They are a bit large to post as source. I'll try attaching them... > > On Monday, March

Re: [beagleboard] BBB Wireless frequently drops connection

For what it's worth. The rpi3 does this as well. Granted perhaps not as much. I've used mine as an ap for my phones, and would get dropped connections at random times. Sometimes days, other times hours. On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 2:06 PM Robert Nelson wrote: > On Tue, Mar

Re: [beagleboard] Debian 9.3 - BBB ver 5AC repeatedly doesn't boot on µSD card unless boot button is pushed each time.

Probably an Old MLO / uboot.img on the eMMC. If the newer is flashed to the eMMC, this problem would probably go away. I've experienced this on many boards myself as / when I forget to update the eMMC. On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Fri,

Re: [beagleboard] display driver

Apparently, the driver was compiled with debug symbols, and in debug mode. On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 7:48 AM, evilwulfie wrote: > The more i learn the more i don't know > > Got most everything working with a spi display but one last issue i cant > seem to figure out. > > if

Re: [beagleboard] Re: SPI on beagle bone black and beagle bone black wireless

Clay, a bit of advice for you. Stop worrying about how you perceive someone over the internet, whom by the way doesn't know you, and you do not know them yourself. I'm not here to hand hold anyone, and I do answer question for those who ask questions in a way that makes sense to me. But if you've

Re: [beagleboard] Re: SPI on beagle bone black and beagle bone black wireless

n RPi3 -- and I think the benchmark wore out the > original RPi3 SD card, before I obtained a small USB hard drive for swap) > > On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 12:10:23 -0700, William Hermans > <yyrk...@gmail.com> declaimed the following: > > > > >You need to slow down, and learn things

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Beaglebone time runs slow despite starting /lib/systemd/systemd-timesyncd

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 12:08 PM, wrote: > Thanks, glad to see I'm not the only one with the issue. Did some more > searching and it seems it only logs the sync that happens at daemon start > up, but is supposed to resync at some compiled in interval. Check the most > recent

Re: [beagleboard] Re: SPI on beagle bone black and beagle bone black wireless

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:57 PM, wrote: > So, this is what so (fun?) about the BB ecosystem. > > I'm updating to the most recent image, trying to run code that has been > working great for a good long time now, and it fails utterly with the same > issue Nuno is

Re: [beagleboard] Is cape manager obsolete? What about device tree overlays?

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Mark A. Yoder wrote: > That fixed it. Thanks... > > Now I see all sorts of gpios are already exported. > export gpio114 gpio13 gpio22 gpio30 gpio46 gpio50 gpio66 gpiochip0 > gpio110 gpio115 gpio14 gpio23 gpio31 gpio47

Re: [beagleboard] How to boot on a custom Linux built with Buildroot?

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:32 PM, RPGamer wrote: > > OK so what's the official kernel sources for the Blue? > > > > I tried different sources, the one provided by Buildroot and this one : > >

Re: [beagleboard] Is cape manager obsolete? What about device tree overlays?

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Mark A. Yoder > wrote: > > bone$ dpkg --list | grep cape > > ii bb-cape-overlays > > 4.4.20171120.0-0rcnee1~stretch+20171120 armhfDevice tree

Re: [beagleboard] Linux Kernel tree for porting to mailine and basic support.

Any video of that workshop ? All I saw from hackaday was Sammy Kamkar etc, regurgitated video . . . -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [beagleboard] Are there more details on the function of the battery and power management?

On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Kellen Lundry wrote: > What all does the power management handle? Can it manage safely charging > a lipo battery and supplying power to the board? Can it be used for > projects that may have power intermittently? Like say a solar powered clock

Re: [beagleboard] Re: u-boot support for pins

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Tracy Smith wrote: > > The need to use E18 and E19 For CAN1 comes from the TI pinmux tool. > > Umm, on the ZCZ package used on the BBB > > E18: dcan1_tx > E19:

Re: [beagleboard] Re: u-boot support for pins

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Tracy Smith wrote: > > E17 and E18 we want to use that are designated as possible CAN1 pins on > the > > BeagleBone Black schematic. > > > > Not using a

Re: [beagleboard] Re: u-boot support for pins

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Tracy Smith wrote: > Ok look this custom board is based on the BeagleBone Black. For all > intense and purposes it is the BBB. The pins for the AM3358 are the same. > The primary difference is no P9 expansion header. What you are suggesting

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Cannot get BBB to flash new OS image

Long story short. When the eMMC has the first, and second stage bootloader installed on it. The board will always load these from the eMMC, and then load the rest from the sdcard when one is inserted. The result is that one can be put into a non working state, because there would be a MLO /

Re: [beagleboard] Re: u-boot support for pins

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:17 AM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:12 AM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Tracy Smith <tlsmith3...@gmail.com> &g

Re: [beagleboard] Re: u-boot support for pins

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:12 AM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Tracy Smith <tlsmith3...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> We have no P9expansion header. I’ve already discussed this with Robert >> Nelson. We are

Re: [beagleboard] Re: u-boot support for pins

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Tracy Smith wrote: > Hi William, > > These overlays from Robert Nelson are associated with the P9 expansion > header. We don’t have a P9 expansion header on the custom BBB we are > using. So we can’t use this overlay. > > Thx, Tracy >

Re: [beagleboard] Re: u-boot support for pins

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:44 AM, Tracy Smith wrote: > Hi William, > > Thanks for the email and here is what I’m trying to do. > > The CANUSB from Lawicel is a standard USB device that looks like a serial > port since it can use the FTDI driver. > > > > On the MachineKit

Fwd: [beagleboard] Re: u-boot support for pins

-- Forwarded message -- From: William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:58 AM Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Re: u-boot support for pins To: Tracy Smith <tlsmith3...@gmail.com> https://github.com/beagleboard/bb.org-overlays/blob/master/src/arm/BB-CA

Re: [beagleboard] Re: u-boot support for pins

SO what is it that you're trying to do ? I've read your posts, but am still mystified. Just sayin' . . . I've been working with this hardware for around 5 years now, have written many device tree overlays for various hardware configurations. Including GPIO, I2C, UART, CAN, SPI, etc. I'm willing

Re: [beagleboard] Can't locate /sys/class/leds folder

On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 2:39 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote: > wgd@wgd:~$ uname -a > Linux wgd 4.4.68-ti-r111 #1 SMP Wed Jun 28 10:06:34 UTC 2017 armv7l > GNU/Linux > wgd@wgd:~$ ls /sys/class/leds/ > beaglebone:green:usr0 beaglebone:green:usr2 &g

Re: [beagleboard] Can't locate /sys/class/leds folder

wgd@wgd:~$ uname -a Linux wgd 4.4.68-ti-r111 #1 SMP Wed Jun 28 10:06:34 UTC 2017 armv7l GNU/Linux wgd@wgd:~$ ls /sys/class/leds/ beaglebone:green:usr0 beaglebone:green:usr2 beaglebone:green:usr1 beaglebone:green:usr3 wgd@wgd:~$ cat /etc/dogtag BeagleBoard.org Debian Image 2017-07-01 -- For

Re: [beagleboard] Re: PocketBeagle workshop at Hackaday Supercon

Just a note, all workshops already sold out. On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:30 PM, CJA wrote: > > Hi Drew, > > Awesome, I just received my PocketBeagle today from arrow.com. Is this > > going

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Adding a USB Port to PocketBeagle

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Graham Haddock wrote: > I am just reporting what "speedtest-cli" says. > > I note that watching "htop" at the same time, on the USB-2 to Ethernet > tests, the CPU is maxing out at 100 percent, so the speed is not > necessarily constrained

Re: [beagleboard] I need a tutorial for how to boot prepare a sd card boot image

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Mrigendra Chaubey < mrigendra.chau...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why i asked this because except I am downloading kernel from Robert's > repository I don't know where beaglebone configs are > selected. > I can only see the soc name like am3xx but no where in configs

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Adding a USB Port to PocketBeagle

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Graham wrote: > I hacked a "quick and dirty" second USB port as described. > Then connected a LAN7500 USB-2 to Gb-Ethernet board. > Came right up, drivers are already in the kernel, no device tree changes. > Connected to the network at 1

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Announcing $25 PocketBeagle

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Jason Kridner > wrote: > > Robert, > > > > Can you add the .bmap file? > > Oh i had stopped generating those by default, i'll quickly add one.. > >

Re: [beagleboard] Serial Baudrates

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Paul Van den Bergh wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm implementing an interface to a commercial product that communicates > over an asynchronous interface at 62500 Baud. Looking at the > files on the BBB I cannot find this setting. Is it at all

Re: [beagleboard] Slow boot times on PocketBeagle

There are options if you're running grub. So, perhaps there is a kernel parameter that can be passed ? Not really a lot of info out there, at least for current web search. And yeah that minute and a half boot is getting old here too. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss ---

Re: [beagleboard] PRU

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 11:38 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > Hi, I am new to beaglebone black PRU can anybody help me to use PRU in > c-language. > > Thank you > Ashok > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=beaglebone+PRU+in+C -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss ---

Re: [beagleboard] Re: ENC28J60 Click on PocketBeagle

On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > > How fast can you push the spi bus? I've just used the 12 mhz, as it was > the default for one of the device tree in the docs.. > > Regards, > > -- > For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss > --- >

Re: [beagleboard] Stretch pwm difference

. My file structure looked exactly the same as your above where you had ecap enabled. On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Robert Nelson <robertcnel...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 3:19 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Robert, > > > >

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Debian 9.1.0 with VirtualBox unable to "sudo apt-get install crossbuild-essential-armhf"

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Jose Valenzuela San Juan < javal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Were you able to do this? > The guide from Derek is a bit outdated. > You don't have to use the source from embedian (as its deprecated). In > debian 9 the cross compiling packages are in the standard

Re: [beagleboard] Stretch pwm difference

I mean this hack fix is fairly trivial. Without the qep's being enabled. debian@wgd:~$ sudo su root@wgd:/home/debian# cd ~ root@wgd:~# nano pwm-enable.sh *#!/bin/bashecho '0' > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/exportecho '1' > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/exportecho '0' >

Re: [beagleboard] Stretch pwm difference

Robert, Ok I think I see what you mean now( fully ). With universal IO and the generic startup script enabled. I did see something similar to what you were saying. However, if one disables both universal IO, and the generic startup script, then writes their own custom overlay for all 3 of the PWM

Re: [beagleboard] Stretch pwm difference

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > > Don't compare "pwmchipX's" directly, you need to dig into the symlink: > > root@beaglebone:/sys/class/pwm# ls -lh > total 0 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Oct 13 17:14 pwmchip0 -> >

[beagleboard] Stretch pwm difference

So a few things to note about pwm behavior on the latest stretch image versus Jessie. Obviously, Jessie by default runs an older kernel. 4.4.x versus 4.9.x. First, Jessie: root@wgd:~# uname -r 4.4.68-ti-r111 root@wgd:~# lsmod |grep pwm pwm_tiehrpwm Stretch: root@wgd:~# uname -r 4.9.50-ti-r61

Re: [beagleboard] Re: PocketBeagle U-Boot Overlays [naming???]

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Graham wrote: > > The interface names seem much more self explanatory. > > The U/M option is workable. > > They list 381 varients: > >

Re: [beagleboard] Announcing $25 PocketBeagle

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Robert Nelson <robertcnel...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:30 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thanks Robert. So pretty much still a work in progress I take it ? > > Works out of the box.. With an

Re: [beagleboard] Announcing $25 PocketBeagle

Thanks Robert. So pretty much still a work in progress I take it ? On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Robert Nelson <robertcnel...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:41 AM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > The board is bootble / usable r

Re: [beagleboard] Announcing $25 PocketBeagle

The board is bootble / usable right now ? The FAQ could be taken both ways. e.g. because of the board overlay file. On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Jason Kridner wrote: > https://beagleboard.org/pocket > > Trying to get a few things documented at https://github.com/ >

Re: [beagleboard] RTC reset after Beaglebone boot

You could also set time on the second rtc during setup after updating the time via nap date then just run a script at boot, and occasionally (once a day?) Using a system timer. With the new fix Robert implemented. . Probably more hassle than it's worth , but it's not that difficult, and it

Re: [beagleboard] JTAG Debugging - 2 Code Composers on the Same Machine - One under Ubuntu - The Other under Windows

If you're serious about your work. Buy a cheap laptop, and install Ubuntu on it. On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Jeff Andich wrote: > Hi, > > We're not yet able to setup Ubuntu native on PC's at work, so we're using > Ubuntu under VBOX. > > I'm attempting to do JTAG

Re: [beagleboard] Reading analog in on the stretch (9.1) images

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 3:18 PM, evilwulfie wrote: > Shame on him. > Just for the record,I did not write that. Ethon Hayon did back in 2012, I'm thinking probably for the white. Same hardware though . . . I know this, because I have a duplicate of his repo on my git, but

Re: [beagleboard] Reading analog in on the stretch (9.1) images

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Mark A. Yoder > wrote: > > How do I read AIN on the latest images? I don't know where to find it in > > /sys/ > > Hi Mark, > > This is with the Blue right?

Re: [beagleboard] Re: RTC's SDA and SCL Resistors

Well, rtc0 is most likely the on AM335x on die real time clock, which will not persist time across reboots. On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 7:54 PM, William B <wbbena...@gmail.com> wrote: > Finally I got ... the last hint from William Hermans indicated me > something about the device name,

Re: [beagleboard] Re: RTC's SDA and SCL Resistors

, 2017 at 4:46 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 4:24 PM, William B <wbbena...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is there any other difference in this latest version of Debian? I'm >> following a tutorial below, but the command "

Re: [beagleboard] Re: RTC's SDA and SCL Resistors

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 4:24 PM, William B wrote: > Is there any other difference in this latest version of Debian? I'm > following a tutorial below, but the command "hwclock -r -f /dev/rtc1" is > indicating failure to communicate with the new device: > > *TUTORIAL*: >

Re: [beagleboard] recommendation for a symbolic debugger

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 4:13 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is probably the best guide you're going to find on the subject. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9yFyWsyyGk > > Never used it myself( I do not cross compile ), but I'm confident DR > M

Re: [beagleboard] recommendation for a symbolic debugger

This is probably the best guide you're going to find on the subject. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9yFyWsyyGk Never used it myself( I do not cross compile ), but I'm confident DR Molly's instructions work. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this

Re: [beagleboard] Re: RTC's SDA and SCL Resistors

ering your question, I'm using the latest available Debian release > (bone-debian-8.8-iot-armhf-2017-07-01-4gb.img) available here: > https://rcn-ee.net/rootfs/bb.org/testing/2017-07-01/iot/ > > *William Hermans: * > When I run the command "i2cdetect -l", I get this information:

Re: [beagleboard] Re: RTC's SDA and SCL Resistors

It's not so much the debian version, as it is the kernel. kernel 3.8.x is different from kernel 4.x. The easiest way to see what is attached it this: root@wgd:~# i2cdetect -l i2c-0 i2c OMAP I2C adapterI2C adapter i2c-1 i2c OMAP I2C adapter

Re: [beagleboard] Re: RTC's SDA and SCL Resistors

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:24 PM, William B wrote: > Hi! > I bought the I2C logic converter 3.3V => 5v and I've connected the RTC to > the BBB, but running "i2cdetect -y -r 1" doesn't find the RTC device. I've > checked the wiring of the connections and I repeated the process

Re: [beagleboard] Battery

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Sri Ram wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Is 3S battery compatible with Beaglebone blue? > > no, 2s only.. > >

Re: [beagleboard] Re: spi / shiftout.js in 2017-03-19 image

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:17 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote: > SPI is notoriously finicky when it comes to high speed, and noise. Since > I'm not an EE, I could not say much more than that. Typically though, from > what I understand, traces can not be very long.

Re: [beagleboard] Re: spi / shiftout.js in 2017-03-19 image

SPI is notoriously finicky when it comes to high speed, and noise. Since I'm not an EE, I could not say much more than that. Typically though, from what I understand, traces can not be very long. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you

Re: [beagleboard] Re: Windows 10 Bone_D64.exe Failing

Well, this is like a 2 year old post . . . Let me just say this. I'm running Windows 10 pro on a Lenovo Thinkpad, and I happened to have a BBG plugged into a USB 3.0 port off this laptop for power( using ethernet for networking ), and Windows update automatically installed the NDIS driver for it

Re: [beagleboard] How to protect scripts and codes?

What Robert said. There is nothing you can write code wise that can not be done by someone else. On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 3:27 PM, wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > How can I protect my scripts and

Re: [beagleboard] spi / shiftout.js in 2017-03-19 image

has loaded through your overlay files, and in fact it's configured correctly for this kernel. I'd double check the above path is actually still pointing to the correct hardware SPI module you're trying to use. On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 4:38 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote: > SO Der

Re: [beagleboard] spi / shiftout.js in 2017-03-19 image

SO Derrek's book is based on kernel 3.8.x where as you're now using a 4.x kernel. Chances are very likely you'll need to chance a few things in relation to SPI. NO hands on with SPI on the beaglebone yet personally. But first, you're going need to make sure your overlay file is correct for this

Re: [beagleboard] BBGW crash

be a nightmare. On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Sebastián Sáez <otra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Williams, I already did the update, apparently it's just for Jessie > > https://github.com/rcn-ee/repos/tree/master/seeed-wificonfig-installer > > On Monday, July 3, 2017 at 5:36:14 PM UTC-4,

Re: [beagleboard] BBGW crash

sudo apt-get update <--- before apt-get install On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Sebastián Sáez wrote: > Hi Robert, I can't find wifidog package for Stretch image. > > image test: bone-debian-9.0-iot-armhf-2017-06-25-4gb.img > > > debian@beaglebone:~$ sudo apt install

Re: [beagleboard] Re: DPRAM interface with BBB

I'm kind of late to the post here but I remember Tom King doing some work maybe for a cape years ago, So, I did a quick search, and found this post. Maybe some useful information for you ? https://groups.google.com/forum/#!category-topic/beagleboard/gpmc/QENqyIYTlO0 On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 9:47

Re: [beagleboard] How to enable USB power with u-boot?

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > Oh, thanks, William, I was inspired doing this by your post! > Oh, cool ! Glad someone reads my stuff now and then ;) > > The problem is that "usb start" starts *u-boot*'s USB subsystem, it > (probably) has nothing

Re: [beagleboard] RE: Um...My Temp in F Degrees is the Same as the C Degrees/Dang!

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:33 PM, Mala Dies wrote: > Mr. Rob, > > Why would I use the value 4096.0? > > Seth > > P.S. I have tried to suit the software to suit my needs and I keep coming > up empty. I will try this value and I will get back to you. > Do you know anything about

Re: [beagleboard] How to enable USB power with u-boot?

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > From this thread https://e2e.ti.com/support/arm/sitara_arm/f/791/t/270060: > Modifying bit 0 of 8 bit register address 0x47401C60 it switch on/off > USB1_DRVVBUS pin > But I don't think you have to do all that. Read

Re: [beagleboard] Possible to remove eeprom?

https://eewiki.net/display/linuxonarm/BeagleBone+Black#BeagleBoneBlack-Bootloader:U-Boot Link to the bootloader source there. Along with the whole build process. Then I do believe what you're asking about removing the eeprom check is possible. Seems you have already done that, but I do remember

Re: [beagleboard] which "arch" subdirectory to use?

Missed a -o in there, but hopefully you get the point ;) On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:36 AM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:12 AM, mzimmers <mzimm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey, William...thanks for the pointers. I actual

Re: [beagleboard] which "arch" subdirectory to use?

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:12 AM, mzimmers wrote: > Hey, William...thanks for the pointers. I actually do already have > cross-development working (for user space programs). I'm using Qt Creator, > and a Linaro toolchain and sysroot. I built Qt for the armhf in order to > get

Re: [beagleboard] which "arch" subdirectory to use?

Ah, something I unintentionally left out. The arch you'll need is armhf. Granted, I'm not 100% sure that even applies to the kernel, or kernel modules. On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 9:58 AM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Then later, once you understand native module develop

Re: [beagleboard] which "arch" subdirectory to use?

Then later, once you understand native module development much better, you'll be able to apply that information towards cross compiling much easier. Just be aware, this is not an overnight sort of situation. It could take years to grasp, but if you apply yourself, it'll probably take a lot less

Re: [beagleboard] which "arch" subdirectory to use?

mz, You know what I'd do in your shoes ? I'd just setup a development sdcard for your bb, and compile modules natively. on the bb. Much simpler, no hassle, no pain in the butt. Compiling a kernel on a bb may take a few days, but a kernel module should not take very long. Another thing you should

Re: [beagleboard] EduMIP BeagleBone Blue on the loose

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Mark A. Yoder > wrote: > >> I turned an EduMIP BeagleBone Blue loose near my laptop and where is what >> happened. >> >> >>

Re: [beagleboard] which "arch" subdirectory to use?

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:54 PM, mzimmers wrote: > Hey, I'm open to any and all ideas. It seems so strange that I'm getting a > seg fault in the client code, though...that does make me suspicious of the > compiler version vs. the headers, etc. > > How do people go about

Re: [beagleboard] which "arch" subdirectory to use?

Yeah, ok, seemed like the obvious question to ask, but maybe too obvious ;) -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Re: [beagleboard] which "arch" subdirectory to use?

mzimmers, Which version of gcc are you using ? -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [beagleboard] which "arch" subdirectory to use?

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 7:34 PM, mzimmers wrote: > Hi, William - > > I have no (current) interest in building my own kernel. I'm trying to do > Dr. Molloy's tutorials because I want to learn about writing device drivers > for Linux (you may recall an earlier discussion where

Re: [beagleboard] which "arch" subdirectory to use?

the kernel for that. On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 5:54 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just in case you do not know already. https://eewiki.net/display/ > linuxonarm/BeagleBone+Black That guide is for the black, there is one for > the white, but don't know if there is o

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >