[Bug 1671231] New: perl-Encode-3.00 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671231 Bug ID: 1671231 Summary: perl-Encode-3.00 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Encode Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: [Late] F30 System-Wide Change proposal: GCC9

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 01:22:19PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 02:12:03PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 01:04:25PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > The variable was already initialized right at the start. The compound > > > literal is

[389-devel] Re: lib389 devel notes

> On 31 Jan 2019, at 13:34, Mark Reynolds wrote: > > > On 1/30/19 9:16 PM, William Brown wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I noticed a few things that seem out of place in lib389’s cli tools. I just >> want to point out that using raw print isn’t really correct. Using log >> allows us to capture the

[389-devel] Re: lib389 devel notes

On 1/30/19 9:16 PM, William Brown wrote: Hi, I noticed a few things that seem out of place in lib389’s cli tools. I just want to point out that using raw print isn’t really correct. Using log allows us to capture the written output for test verification, so always use log, not print. We

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-01-31 - % PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/01/31/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.1-20190131gitaf9bb72.fc29.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[389-devel] Please review 50184 - cli tool parity for lib389

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50190 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50184 — Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

[389-devel] lib389 devel notes

Hi, I noticed a few things that seem out of place in lib389’s cli tools. I just want to point out that using raw print isn’t really correct. Using log allows us to capture the written output for test verification, so always use log, not print. If you are then writing a function on a lib389

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal

On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 9:05:42 PM EST Simon Farnsworth wrote: > Where are you licensed to practice law? And is this legal advice that I can > rely on your professional liability insurance for? Note that this statement > is the exact opposite of one I've had from a real lawyer whose

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal

> On 31 Jan 2019, at 01:21, John Harris wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 8:10:13 PM EST Simon Farnsworth wrote: >> I do if I'm using it to provide a service that could be construed as "making >> the functionality of the Program … available to third parties as a >> service", under

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal

On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 8:10:13 PM EST Simon Farnsworth wrote: > I do if I'm using it to provide a service that could be construed as "making > the functionality of the Program … available to third parties as a > service", under section 13 of the SSPL. As MongoDB's functionality includes >

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal

Note that I'm not a lawyer of any type - this is a distillation of conversations I've had with real lawyers, but you should not take it as legal advice. Talk to your own legal people if you need something you can rely on. > On 30 Jan 2019, at 23:41, John Harris wrote: > > On Wednesday,

[EPEL-devel] Incoming rebase to Pagure 5.x for EPEL 7 (+ python-celery in EPEL 7 now)

Hey all, After the discovery of the lack of python-celery in EPEL 7 when I first proposed the rebase update for the "pagure" package a few months ago, I went back to working out how to bring celery into EPEL 7. I'm pleased to say that a new update has been proposed[1] that updates "pagure" and

Re: NeuroFedora review swaps

Hello, Here's the next NeuroFedora package that needs review: - auryn: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671171 Always happy to swap reviews :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal

On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 4:19:13 PM EST Simon Farnsworth wrote: > But the SSPL also prevents you from using Free Software with it, unless you > have sufficient rights to offer said Free Software under the SSPL, as per > section 13 of the SSPL. You don't have to relicense software in order

Re: Fixing Wireguard spec file

Hey Germano, I have a working RPM that does not error out with Error! Could not locate dkms.conf file if you want to test it out before I push it to copr.

Re: exiv2-0.27.0 coming to rawhide

All builds that I'm aware of have been submitted for rawhide. I've filed bugs to track all known failures, tracked here, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665246 Any help to resolve these would be much appreciated. -- Rex ___ devel mailing

Re: Boost 1.69 update with soname bumps in rawhide/F30

On 30/01/19 21:16 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Hi, Jon. On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 13:31, Jonathan Wakely wrote: [...] The following packages fail to build because boost::tribool is no longer impicitly convertible to bool (and so the conversion must be done explicitly

Re: Outage 2019-02-02 13:00 UTC -> 15:00 UTC

On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 16:31, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:16 PM Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > > > > > > This outage is a replacement of an earlier one in December which had to > be cancelled. > > > > > > There will be an outage starting at 2019-02-02 13:00 UTC, > >

Self Introduction

Hi Folks. My name is Samuel and I have been a user of Fedora for about 7 years now. I am a systems engineer co-maintaining my company's patching infrastructure, working closely with carlwgeorge. I use Fedora as my main workstation with special interest in both exotic display and audio

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 12:36 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 1/30/19 9:45 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 28. 01. 19 18:27, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > (Note this change was previously submitted for Fedora 29: > > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2064) > > > > > >

Re: Outage 2019-02-02 13:00 UTC -> 15:00 UTC

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:16 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > This outage is a replacement of an earlier one in December which had to be > cancelled. > > > There will be an outage starting at 2019-02-02 13:00 UTC, > which will last approximately 2 hours. The f30 mass rebuild got delayed at

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal

> On 30 Jan 2019, at 17:06, John Harris wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 10:28:46 PM EST Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:33 PM John Harris wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 5:29:58 AM EST Ben Cotton wrote: >>> Fedora has determined that the

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

On 1/30/19 9:45 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 28. 01. 19 18:27, Ben Cotton wrote: >> (Note this change was previously submitted for Fedora 29: >> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2064) >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Retire_YUM_3 > > Based on the entire discussion so far, here's my

Re: Boost 1.69 update with soname bumps in rawhide/F30

Hi, Jon. On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 13:31, Jonathan Wakely wrote: [...] > The following packages fail to build because boost::tribool is no > longer impicitly convertible to bool (and so the conversion must be > done explicitly with a cast). I'll try to fix these if I have time: > >

Re: Self Introduction: Gergely Gombos

Welcome to Fedora! On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 at 17:54, Gergely Gombos wrote: > Hi Fedora devs, > > My name is Gergely Gombos. I've been using Fedora for about 1.5 years and > I'm a software developer. I like the FOSS philosophy and using a lot of > open-source software in the Javascript

Re: Organizing a "packager experience" objective and working group

On 1/14/19 12:04 PM, Ben Rosser wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 8:11 AM Igor Gnatenko > wrote: >> >> I'm definitely interested to help (I have 6+ years experience as a packager)! >> >> Can we have a topic on discussion.fp.o? I think it is much easier to discuss >> such things there. > >

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

On 28. 01. 19 18:27, Ben Cotton wrote: (Note this change was previously submitted for Fedora 29: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2064) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Retire_YUM_3 Based on the entire discussion so far, here's my proposal: - we change this to a system wide change - we

Outage 2019-02-02 13:00 UTC -> 15:00 UTC

This outage is a replacement of an earlier one in December which had to be cancelled. There will be an outage starting at 2019-02-02 13:00 UTC, which will last approximately 2 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal

Fedora does not run RPM Fusion nor have any say of what is in it so any discussion of doing so would need to be over in their mailing lists etc versus Fedora. On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 12:16, Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm not sure if my previous email made it through and it's not an ideal > solution

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

Am Mittwoch, den 30.01.2019, 15:50 +0100 schrieb Tomasz Torcz: > I saw exactly this on Monday. I submitted a build of owfs package, > which immediately failed with > DEBUG util.py:490: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides gcc = 8.69 > needed by annobin-8.69-2.fc30.x86_64 > > Strange thing was,

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal

I'm not sure if my previous email made it through and it's not an ideal solution but... What about moving MongoDB and it's dependencies to RPM Fusion? Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Outage 2019-02-02 13:00 UTC -> 15:00 UTC

This outage is a replacement of an earlier one in December which had to be cancelled. There will be an outage starting at 2019-02-02 13:00 UTC, which will last approximately 2 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal

On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 10:28:46 PM EST Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:33 PM John Harris wrote: > > > > > > > On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 5:29:58 AM EST Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > > Fedora has determined that the Server Side Public Licensev1 (SSPL) is > > > not a Free

Self Introduction: Gergely Gombos

Hi Fedora devs, My name is Gergely Gombos. I've been using Fedora for about 1.5 years and I'm a software developer. I like the FOSS philosophy and using a lot of open-source software in the Javascript world, I'd like to make my contribution, too. I'm looking for a sponsor, and my first RPM

Re: exiv2-0.27.0 coming to rawhide

Thank you Rex ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines:

Re: exiv2-0.27.0 coming to rawhide

Sorry for the delay, but took a while to have some time to work on it, so as threatened/promised, starting today asap in earnest. -- Rex ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

On 30/01/2019 14:50, Tomasz Torcz wrote: I saw exactly this on Monday. I submitted a build of owfs package, which immediately failed with DEBUG util.py:490: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides gcc = 8.69 needed by annobin-8.69-2.fc30.x86_64 Strange thing was, annobin-8.69-2.fc30.x86_64

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 03:20:31PM +0100, Michal Schorm wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:06 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Not necessarily. Builds are only pushed to repositories after a successful > > compose, but are available in koji only a few minutes after they were built. > > That means

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

Yes I think it's been about a week since the last rawhide compose so the mirrors are well out of date. With the mass rebuild about to start it's probably not going to get better any time soon either... Tom On 30/01/2019 14:37, Michal Schorm wrote: Right. Yes, I'm trying to test the

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

Right. Yes, I'm trying to test the installation from the mirrors. There will be a delay. Buildroot repo != compose repo. That's where I was mistaken. Case closed, I'll wait :) Thanks -- Michal Schorm Software Engineer Core Services - Databases Team Red Hat -- On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:30 PM

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

What do you mean by "install time" exactly? Do you mean you have a system using rawhide from the mirrors and you are trying to install there? If so are you installing community-mysql itself from the mirrors? or have you fetched than from koji to install manually? Tom On 30/01/2019 14:20,

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

* Michal Schorm: > That means, it was available in the buildroot, but not in the repository. > How is that possible? The buildroot also need the exact same > repository to install packages from, right? The default repository for mock and installations is a compose. It is regularly recreated

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:06 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > Not necessarily. Builds are only pushed to repositories after a successful > compose, but are available in koji only a few minutes after they were built. > That means that packages built locally or on COPR (which use the rawhide >

Re: Fixing Wireguard spec file

I am actively trying to track down why DKMS is not removing the old WireGuard version correctly. I suspect it is something to do with DKMS as other WireGuard users that use DKMS for things like ZFS (https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/linux/MyKernelUpdateSteps) are setting the same kinds

Re: Strange rawhide behaviour

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019, 14:56 Michal Schorm Hello, > > I built "community-mysql" package in version 8.0.14 in rawhide. > It was built on top of "libicu-devel" 63.1-1.fc30 > > -- > > 1) > But when I tried to install the community-mysql package into Rawhide, I > got: > nothing provides

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of ldconfig scriptlets

Tomasz, feel free to send pull requests for rest of packages. ~150 packages is definitely smaller amount than ~1800. On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 2:51 PM Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 19:07, Igor Gnatenko > wrote: >> >> And ldconfig part is done. I'll remove other scriptlets

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of ldconfig scriptlets

I'm definitely not touching glibc ;) The rest is minority and probably shouldn't be touched (esp. LLVM). I can take a look after mass rebuild. On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 2:56 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Tomasz Kłoczko: > > > glibc.spec > > Please do not change glibc. > > Thanks, > Florian >

Strange rawhide behaviour

Hello, I built "community-mysql" package in version 8.0.14 in rawhide. It was built on top of "libicu-devel" 63.1-1.fc30 -- 1) But when I tried to install the community-mysql package into Rawhide, I got: nothing provides libicuio.so.63()(64bit) needed by

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of ldconfig scriptlets

* Tomasz Kłoczko: > glibc.spec Please do not change glibc. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of ldconfig scriptlets

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 19:07, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > And ldconfig part is done. I'll remove other scriptlets this/next week. > [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ egrep "^%p.*/sbin/ldconfig|Requres:.*/sbin/ldconfig|^/sbin/ldconfig" * -l | wc -l 168 [tkloczko@domek

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:31 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:33 PM John Harris wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 5:29:58 AM EST Ben Cotton wrote: > > > Fedora has determined that the Server Side Public Licensev1 (SSPL) is > > > not a Free Software License. > > > >

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019, 13:56 Peter Robinson On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 9:41 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > * Miro Hrončok: > > > > > On 29. 01. 19 19:04, John Harris wrote: > > >> On Monday, January 28, 2019 12:27:19 PM EST Ben Cotton wrote: > > >>> Remove packages from the distribution: > > >>> *

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

Dne 30. 01. 19 v 13:10 Matthew Miller napsal(a): > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 11:49:55AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> 1) Move System-Wide and Self-Contained proposal deadlines to be the >>> same date and allow FESCO/etc determine if the proposal needs to be >>> moved to SW or SC then? >> This split

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 9:41 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Miro Hrončok: > > > On 29. 01. 19 19:04, John Harris wrote: > >> On Monday, January 28, 2019 12:27:19 PM EST Ben Cotton wrote: > >>> Remove packages from the distribution: > >>> * createrepo > >>> * yum > >>> * yum-langpacks > >>> *

Re: Boost 1.69 update with soname bumps in rawhide/F30

On 30. 01. 19 13:31, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 25/01/19 15:57 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: With enormous thanks to Denis Arnaud for doing the actual boost.spec rebase, we're ready to update Boost in rawhide, for this change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F30Boost169 As always, this

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 07:11, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 11:49:55AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > 1) Move System-Wide and Self-Contained proposal deadlines to be the > > > same date and allow FESCO/etc determine if the proposal needs to be > > > moved to SW or SC then? > >

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

On Tue, 2019-01-29 at 14:31 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 05:42, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 06:41:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > This feels more like system-wide change… > > > > Especially since you say that some extra packages

Re: Boost 1.69 update with soname bumps in rawhide/F30

On 25/01/19 15:57 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: With enormous thanks to Denis Arnaud for doing the actual boost.spec rebase, we're ready to update Boost in rawhide, for this change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F30Boost169 As always, this changes the soname of every libboost_*.so

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 11:49:55AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > 1) Move System-Wide and Self-Contained proposal deadlines to be the > > same date and allow FESCO/etc determine if the proposal needs to be > > moved to SW or SC then? > This split between SW and SC was artificial since the beginning

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal

* John Harris: > On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 5:29:58 AM EST Ben Cotton wrote: >> Fedora has determined that the Server Side Public Licensev1 (SSPL) is >> not a Free Software License. > > For what reason is SSPL considered non-free? As I see, it's > essentially a GPL incompatible AGPL license.

Re: Sync deadlines for self contained and system wide changes

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 29. 01. 19 20:31, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > 1) Move System-Wide and Self-Contained proposal deadlines to be the same > > date > > and allow FESCO/etc determine if the proposal needs to be moved to SW or SC > > then? > > 2) Move

Vagrant 2.2 with QEMU Session

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Vagrant_2.2_with_QEMU_Session == Summary == Upgrade to Vagrant 2.2, the latest stable version of Vagrant. Enable QEMU Session by default. == Owner == * Name: [[User:pvalena | Pavel Valena]], [[User:vondruch | Vit Ondruch]] * Email: pval...@redhat.com,

Re: Vagrant 2.2 with QEMU Session

On 30. 01. 19 11:45, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 30. 01. 19 v 11:40 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): On 30. 01. 19 11:21, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:36:59AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: * Add support for VirtualBox 6.0 Does this affect us? How? Affects users with VirtualBox 6

Sync deadlines for self contained and system wide changes

On 29. 01. 19 20:31, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: This is like the 4th system wide change this release which is coming in as a Self-Contained. Each time the developer thinks it is self-contained because it is just one  little thing, but on regards it turns into being a system-wide change.

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

Dne 29. 01. 19 v 20:31 Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a): > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 05:42, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 06:41:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > >This feels more like system-wide change… > > >Especially since

Re: Vagrant 2.2 with QEMU Session

Dne 30. 01. 19 v 11:40 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > On 30. 01. 19 11:21, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:36:59AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: >>> * Enable QEMU Session by default. With this, there's no need for user >>> to input any password, or be present in some group. Everyone is

Re: Vagrant 2.2 with QEMU Session

On 30. 01. 19 11:21, Matthew Miller wrote: On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:36:59AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: * Enable QEMU Session by default. With this, there's no need for user to input any password, or be present in some group. Everyone is able to use Vagrant, regardless of group or other ACLs.

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bash 5.0

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:06:25PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > Please don't do that. You'll basically break the distribution for all > third-party packagers. Modules are not supported by anyone at all, and > it's too difficult to integrate as it currently stands (and I'm > actually trying because

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bash 5.0

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 03:01:55PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > But wait also: can't the module just refer to the release-branch (base) > > dist-git? Why maintain two copies? > Well, they can. But someone needs to build it twice: once using fedpkg > build and once using fedpkg module-build from

[Code complete, needs testing] Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: libcrypt.so.1 (compatibility library for POSIX): Let encrypt, encrypt_r, setkey, setkey_r, and fcrypt return ENOSYS instead of pe

The change [1] has been successfully implemented and is code complete, pending QA / testing. You will need to have libxcrypt-compat >= 4.4.3-3.fc30 and some prebuilt binary linking at least one of these functions installed for testing this: * encrypt{,_r} * setkey{,_r} * fcrypt Please

Re: Vagrant 2.2 with QEMU Session

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 04:36:59AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > * Enable QEMU Session by default. With this, there's no need for user > to input any password, or be present in some group. Everyone is able > to use Vagrant, regardless of group or other ACLs. This seems amazing. > * Add support for

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal

Dne 29. 01. 19 v 16:22 Florian Weimer napsal(a): > * Honza Horak: > >>> Yes, right. There is rubygem-mongo and rubygem-mongoid and they will >>> become FTBFS without MongoDB. The test suite could be disabled, but this >>> will be unfortunate, because historically it helped to uncover issues on

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bash 5.0

On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 10:32 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > and the results show up in Bodhi (albeit under the heading > 'undefined', which is a bug we should fix): > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9d006f6254 (see > Automated Tests tab)

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bash 5.0

- Original Message - > From: "Adam Williamson" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , "Neal Gompa" > Cc: "Stef Walter" , svashi...@redhat.com > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 10:32:32 AM > Subject: Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bash 5.0 > > So for the

Re: Vagrant 2.2 with QEMU Session

To be clear, this is a F30 Self-Contained Change proposal. /me drinks more coffee -- Ben Cotton Fedora Program Manager TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Retire YUM 3

* Miro Hrončok: > On 29. 01. 19 19:04, John Harris wrote: >> On Monday, January 28, 2019 12:27:19 PM EST Ben Cotton wrote: >>> Remove packages from the distribution: >>> * createrepo >>> * yum >>> * yum-langpacks >>> * yum-utils >>> * yum-metadata-parser >>> * yum-updatesd >>> * python-urlgrabber

Vagrant 2.2 with QEMU Session

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Vagrant_2.2_with_QEMU_Session == Summary == Upgrade to Vagrant 2.2, the latest stable version of Vagrant. Enable QEMU Session by default. == Owner == * Name: [[User:pvalena | Pavel Valena]], [[User:vondruch | Vit Ondruch]] * Email: pval...@redhat.com,

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bash 5.0

On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 08:56 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Have you run these tests on bash 5.0 rebase yet? Also, would it be > > possible to get this into Fedora Dist-Git so that the checks could be > > run as part of any build/update/PR to the package? > > Great point, Neal - that would

Re: Server Side Public License (SSPL) v1

John, You can see the discussion on the legal mailing list's archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/US4PKGDMBQRDYGIYVM2ETARJ5ZPU7TNX/#US4PKGDMBQRDYGIYVM2ETARJ5ZPU7TNX If you have further questions, le...@lists.fedoraproject.org is the right

Fedora 30 Mass Rebuild

Hi all, Per the Fedora 30 schedule[1] we are supposed to start the mass rebuild on Jan 30th 2019, but due to known bug with gcc it got pushed by a day and will start on Jan 31st 2019[2]. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 30 for all the changes listed in https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8086

Fedora 30 Mass Rebuild

Hi all, Per the Fedora 30 schedule[1] we are supposed to start the mass rebuild on Jan 30th 2019, but due to known bug with gcc it got pushed by a day and will start on Jan 31st 2019[2]. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 30 for all the changes listed in https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8086