On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 03:59 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Jaroslav Prokop wrote:
> > But apparently some already took on this task [0].
> > [0] https://github.com/hpcng/rocky
>
> The official website is:
> https://rockylinux.org/
> (Still somewhat under construction, of course.)
>
> It
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906282
Bug ID: 1906282
Summary: perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Text-Fuzzy
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906282
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been
automatically reported. Sorry!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Good morning,
20/12/9 23:24(e)an, Kevin Fenzi igorleak idatzi zuen:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 08:02:45AM +0100, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
20/12/4 20:42(e)an, Kevin Fenzi igorleak idatzi zuen:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:45:03AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 12/3/20 4:39 PM, Petr Šabata
Background: we're resurrecting the dormant epel-wranglers SIG as epel-
packagers-sig. Members will co-maintain packages for EPEL that the SIG
is interested in, if the primary maintainers are not interested in
supporting EPEL.
Per the discussion in the EPEL SIG meeting last Friday, the following
Jaroslav Prokop wrote:
> But apparently some already took on this task [0].
> [0] https://github.com/hpcng/rocky
The official website is:
https://rockylinux.org/
(Still somewhat under construction, of course.)
It was started by the original founder of CentOS with the aim of going back
to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906256
Bug ID: 1906256
Summary: perl-Cache-FastMmap-1.53 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Cache-FastMmap
Keywords: FutureFeature,
On 12/9/20 9:27 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
After updating to CentOS 8.3, my plasma (KDE) desktop is not starting. It
seems like X is not starting. Is anyone else seeing this and knows what's
happening? I haven't had a chance to dig much deeper myself yet...
Orion
This was likely triggered
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902861
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Locale-Codes-3.66-1.fc |perl-Locale-Codes-3.66-1.fc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902728
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-PAR-Dist-0.51-1.fc34 |perl-PAR-Dist-0.51-1.fc34
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902861
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902728
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
On 2020-12-09 16:46, Damian Ivanov wrote:
All this sounds cool, rolling release FTW!
On that topic (rolling release) I have another suggestion - please
fork the thread if that's too OT.
Rawhide is good so far but is not suitable as a productive rolling
release because some packages have debug
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 12:53:05PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
...snip...
>
> There were bug reports already that I hadn't found as I was looking for
> glibc bugs:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905667
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905964
>
> so, skip
On 12/10/20 12:47 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 12/9/20 10:43 PM, Kai A. Hiller wrote:
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of a python package that uses pytest and the pytest plugin
pytest-django (python-authlib). Under %check I currently run `%{python3} -m
pytest tests/core` to execute the tests. Now I
On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
...
* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
Should there be an update of:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/JavaScript/
On 12/9/20 10:43 PM, Kai A. Hiller wrote:
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of a python package that uses pytest and the pytest plugin
pytest-django (python-authlib). Under %check I currently run `%{python3} -m
pytest tests/core` to execute the tests. Now I wanted to do the right thing and
change that
On 12/9/20 9:56 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:21 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
== How To Test ==
* Install all nodejs libraries in Fedora 33. Try to update to Fedora 34.
What is the plan wrt Obsoletes of the removed packages?
--
Miro
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 12:27:10AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 12/8/20 11:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Well, I don't want to keep master around in any form... and yeah, I
> > realize there's going to be fallout. ;(
>
> Maybe we can phase it? First, provide the backwards compatible ref, see
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 08:09:44AM +0100, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
> Would be great if we add a deprecation notice (wich could include an EOL for
> the symbolic-ref) to git's output while operating on master branch :D
I think that would require changes on the git client end?
kevin
--
>
>
>
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 08:02:45AM +0100, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
>
>
> 20/12/4 20:42(e)an, Kevin Fenzi igorleak idatzi zuen:
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 12:45:03AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 12/3/20 4:39 PM, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:34 PM Pierre-Yves
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 04:25:53PM -0500, Stuart D Gathman wrote:
> Wouldn't "rawhide" be more consistent with the other branch names?
This has been discussed elsewhere in the thread.
I think we agreed to add a sym-ref between rawhide and main (ie, either
would work).
I can get the change
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 09:21:34PM -, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft wrote:
> hi,
>
> I see some pagure.io project are automatically handled by this change
>
> could teams register their repositories to be migrated automatically?
> if so, what's the deadline to ask for our repositories to be
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F34Boost175
== Summary ==
This change brings Boost 1.75 to Fedora. This will mean Fedora ships
with a recent upstream Boost release.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:trodgers| Thomas Rodgers]]
* Email: trodg...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
The aim is
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F34Boost175
== Summary ==
This change brings Boost 1.75 to Fedora. This will mean Fedora ships
with a recent upstream Boost release.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:trodgers| Thomas Rodgers]]
* Email: trodg...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
The aim is
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of a python package that uses pytest and the pytest
plugin pytest-django (python-authlib). Under %check I currently run
`%{python3} -m pytest tests/core` to execute the tests. Now I wanted to
do the right thing and change that line to the %pytest macro (`%pytest
Wouldn't "rawhide" be more consistent with the other branch names?
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main
== Summary ==
This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the
default git branch instead of "master".
hi,
I see some pagure.io project are automatically handled by this change
could teams register their repositories to be migrated automatically?
if so, what's the deadline to ask for our repositories to be included in this
change?
___
devel mailing
At the moment this is their landing page:
https://github.com/rocky-linux/organization/wiki/Contributing
and they're working on a home page today for rockylinux.org.
Dave
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 03:53:12PM +0100, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> On 09.12.20 15:20, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > Does
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:21 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == How To Test ==
> >
> > * Install all nodejs libraries in Fedora 33. Try to update to Fedora 34.
>
> What is the plan wrt Obsoletes of the removed packages?
>
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
We do not
On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 12:02 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 10:34 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hey folks!
> >
> > Just a heads up that the most recent Rawhide compose (20201208.n.0)
> > seems badly broken; console login doesn't work and 'su' segfaults. I
> > think the
* Jerry James:
> Greetings all,
>
> TBB 2021.1.1 is out, and comes with many improvements. It also comes
> with an soname bump, so we will have to rebuild all consumers. I
> believe the following is the list of packages to be rebuilt.
> Hopefully my repoquery skills have been up to the task.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:52 AM James Cassell
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, at 1:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > For Nodejs, Fedora should only package:
> > * The interpreter, development
On Wednesday, December 9, 2020 3:40:47 AM WET Steve Dickson wrote:
> Its a kernel problem... On the 5-9 kernel I tried
> bluez-5.53, bluez-5.54, bluez-5.5 all failed
> with Connection refused (111)
>
> Then I tried bluez-5.5 on the last 5.8 kernel
> (5.8.18-300.fc33)... everything worked again
On 09/12/2020 20:55, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 08:46:39PM +0100, Jaroslav Prokop wrote:
Looks like my use case should be included and hopefully with good
options :).
Although the way of communicating it feels a bit unfortunate.
I would at least like to see what kind of
After feedback from several users still doing _development_ against EL6,
we decided to re-enable epel-6 build chroots temporarily (probably till
the end of ELS of RHEL 6, but without promises).
CentOS 6 repos are not mirrored anymore, so the builds are now done
against the repos on
On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 10:34 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks!
>
> Just a heads up that the most recent Rawhide compose (20201208.n.0)
> seems badly broken; console login doesn't work and 'su' segfaults. I
> think the most likely cause of these issues is the new glibc 2.32.9000-
> 19.fc34
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 08:46:39PM +0100, Jaroslav Prokop wrote:
> Looks like my use case should be included and hopefully with good
> options :).
>
> Although the way of communicating it feels a bit unfortunate.
> I would at least like to see what kind of initiatives are we talking
> about, what
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906052
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, at 1:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
>
> == Summary ==
>
> For Nodejs, Fedora should only package:
> * The interpreter, development headers/libraries, and the assorted
> tools to manage project-level
On 09/12/2020 20:24, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 02:07:01PM +0100, Jaroslav Prokop wrote:
It would provide with what is lost with CentOS Linux.
Let's entertain an example:
I would like to setup a home server with some locally hosted
services, but I wouldn't like to update it
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 02:07:01PM +0100, Jaroslav Prokop wrote:
> It would provide with what is lost with CentOS Linux.
> Let's entertain an example:
> I would like to setup a home server with some locally hosted
> services, but I wouldn't like to update it to new system with new
> software every
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 12:26:18AM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> How does this (https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/)
> affect Fedora?
I wrote a blog post about this last September and I think it's all still
very true:
https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-and-centos-stream/
On 12/8/20 8:20 AM, Robin Opletal wrote:
Hi,
As I have said earlier, I am trying to package aerc, the mail client,
for Fedora. What didn't cross my mind is that internet access will be
limited during the build, thus the automatic dependency resolution
from the Makefile during the build stage of
Greetings all,
TBB 2021.1.1 is out, and comes with many improvements. It also comes
with an soname bump, so we will have to rebuild all consumers. I
believe the following is the list of packages to be rebuilt.
Hopefully my repoquery skills have been up to the task.
By package, with
On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
== How To Test ==
* Install all nodejs libraries in Fedora 33. Try to update to Fedora 34.
What is the plan wrt Obsoletes of the removed packages?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
== Summary ==
For Nodejs, Fedora should only package:
* The interpreter, development headers/libraries, and the assorted
tools to manage project-level installations (NPM, yarn, etc.).
* Packages that provide binaries that
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS236
== Summary ==
Rebase the binutils package from version 2.35.1 to version 2.36.
== Owner ==
* Name: Nick Clifton [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Nickc]
* Email: ni...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
Switch the binutils package
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
== Summary ==
For Nodejs, Fedora should only package:
* The interpreter, development headers/libraries, and the assorted
tools to manage project-level installations (NPM, yarn, etc.).
* Packages that provide binaries that
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS236
== Summary ==
Rebase the binutils package from version 2.35.1 to version 2.36.
== Owner ==
* Name: Nick Clifton [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Nickc]
* Email: ni...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
Switch the binutils package
Hello!
On 09.12.20 18:08, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
For those that want the equivalent of a point release,
I would think they should be able to write an ansible
script to upgrade to the point release of packages
that EL 8.x ship with.
Just had the same idea. ;-)
So if I only upgrade to the
Hey folks!
Just a heads up that the most recent Rawhide compose (20201208.n.0)
seems badly broken; console login doesn't work and 'su' segfaults. I
think the most likely cause of these issues is the new glibc 2.32.9000-
19.fc34 build.
So if you're running Rawhide I'd recommend holding off on
On 12/9/20 12:33 PM, Jaroslav Prokop wrote:
Hello,
On 09/12/2020 12:12, Christoph Karl wrote:
Hello!
On 09.12.20 04:26, Sergio Belkin wrote:
How does this (https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/)
affect Fedora?
I think Fedora now needs some kind of LTS.
At least I was
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
On 12/8/20 6:06 PM, Jean-Baptiste wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> our localization system, for every single doc component is broken.
>
> The reason is the change of branch from "master" to "main".
>
I do not understand how this happened. Only a handful of Fedora Docs
repos have
I just tested on my laptop running CentOS 8. Updated to 8.3 and both
X and KDE started up with no problems.
Do you have something special like an nvidia card with drivers?
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 8:29 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> After updating to CentOS 8.3, my plasma (KDE) desktop is not
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 4:52 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> For some folks / maintenance styles this might still be an issue, but
> it should work OK in quite a lot of cases. It's not like you're running
> Rawhide.
For those that want the equivalent of a point release,
I would think they should be
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 11:17:46AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> wrt https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/
>
> Since EPEL 8 is for RHEL 8 and EPEL Next 8 is for CentOS Stream 8, I assumed
> we will continue to use CentOS Linux 8 for local mock (and Copr) builds of
>
On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 14:07 +0100, Jaroslav Prokop wrote:
>
> If I understood the announcement, it would be a kind of CentOS streams
> is rolling release or a release with short
> release interval. That does not make my job much easier as someone who
> just sets up services and leaves it
After updating to CentOS 8.3, my plasma (KDE) desktop is not starting. It
seems like X is not starting. Is anyone else seeing this and knows what's
happening? I haven't had a chance to dig much deeper myself yet...
Orion
--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4485
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 8:34 PM Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Am 08.12.20 um 19:32 schrieb Dridi Boukelmoune:
> >
> >> Petr was so nice to supply a test procedure, i suggest that you use it
> >> also.
> > I'll try to strace stuff to to see what's going on, but I can only
> > assume that this BZ is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906052
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1900710
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900710
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1906052
--- Comment #4 from Steve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906052
Bug ID: 1906052
Summary: Please build perl-Eval-WithLexicals for EPEL8
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Eval-WithLexicals
Assignee:
>> Maybe provide a rolling release fedora as well (which is
>> suitable for non-debug systems).
>
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RawhideKernelNodebug
>
> -Jared
Thanks, I thought to recall that it's not just the kernel.
Also mentioned in the wiki link is that it doesn't work with secureboot.
I
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4484
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 09.12.20 15:20, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Does anyone know of a group that is going to start their own RHEL Clone?
I'm sure the Scientific Linux people will do something, given that they
just recently decided to not release SL8 but rather use CentOS 8. I feel
quite bad for them, actually ...
Some
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Scott Talbert wrote:
I'm working on test builds of OpenColorIO 2.0 in a COPR[1] and one of the
requirements to build the documentation is python-testresources.
The problem is it's looking for version 2.0+ but only 1.0 is in Fedora[2].
But I can't even find where that exists
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm working on test builds of OpenColorIO 2.0 in a COPR[1] and one of the
requirements to build the documentation is python-testresources.
The problem is it's looking for version 2.0+ but only 1.0 is in Fedora[2].
But I can't even find where that exists
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4482
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 2:19 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> wrt https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/
>
> Since EPEL 8 is for RHEL 8 and EPEL Next 8 is for CentOS Stream 8, I assumed
> we
> will continue to use CentOS Linux 8 for local mock (and Copr) builds of EPEL 8
>
Sorry for sending this late :)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 onirc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-12-09
(Just to be clear before I start, I was not involved in the decision
process for yesterday's announcement.)
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:29 PM Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
> Hi,
> How does this (https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/)
> affect Fedora?
The short version: it doesn't.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 8:57 AM Damian Ivanov
wrote:
> Maybe provide a rolling release fedora as well (which is
> suitable for non-debug systems).
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RawhideKernelNodebug
-Jared
___
devel mailing list --
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 1:54 AM Petr Šabata wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:57 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:13:13PM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 7:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:23:08PM +0100, Petr
All this sounds cool, rolling release FTW!
On that topic (rolling release) I have another suggestion - please
fork the thread if that's too OT.
Rawhide is good so far but is not suitable as a productive rolling
release because some packages have debug flags that slow the system
down
(I have
On 12/9/20 1:31 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
It follows that the solutions are nonnegative under the following
conditions:
* a+b≥c
* a+c≥b
* b+c≥a
which are quite logical. Consider a=4, b=1, and c=1, i.e., disks of 4 GB,
1 GB, and 1 GB. Each of the 1 GB disks can only mirror (at most) 1 of
Hello,
On 09/12/2020 13:28, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:12 AM Christoph Karl wrote:
Hello!
On 09.12.20 04:26, Sergio Belkin wrote:
How does this (https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/)
affect Fedora?
I think Fedora now needs some kind of LTS.
Why?
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 5:33 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 02. 12. 20 v 14:18 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > I think that unless it's actually being split out from upstream
> > sources from the xorg-server repo, it would just be easier to call it
> > xorg-x11-server-Xwayland.
>
> That was also my
El mié, 9 dic 2020 a las 9:28, Peter Robinson ()
escribió:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:12 AM Christoph Karl wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > On 09.12.20 04:26, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > > How does this (
> https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/)
> > > affect Fedora?
> >
> > I think
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905896
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-557bf13b96 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-557bf13b96
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905896
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-557bf13b96 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-557bf13b96
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
Hi Robin,
"Robin Opletal" writes:
> On Tue Dec 8, 2020 at 8:17 PM CET, Dan Čermák wrote:
>> Hi Robin,
>
> Hi Dan,
>
>> BuildRequires: golang($url/$owner/$pkg)
>> indicates a dependent package that must be available in Fedora. It is
>> actually not a macro, it's just a naming convention for
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:12 AM Christoph Karl wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On 09.12.20 04:26, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > How does this (https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/)
> > affect Fedora?
>
> I think Fedora now needs some kind of LTS.
Why? What would it provide that CentOS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905896
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 1:15 PM Ondrej Budai wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> st 9. 12. 2020 v 12:35 odesílatel Jaroslav Prokop
> napsal:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 09/12/2020 12:12, Christoph Karl wrote:
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > On 09.12.20 04:26, Sergio Belkin wrote:
>> >> How does this
Hello!
st 9. 12. 2020 v 12:35 odesílatel Jaroslav Prokop
napsal:
> Hello,
>
> On 09/12/2020 12:12, Christoph Karl wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > On 09.12.20 04:26, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> >> How does this (https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/
> )
> >> affect Fedora?
> >
> > I
Hello,
On 09/12/2020 12:12, Christoph Karl wrote:
Hello!
On 09.12.20 04:26, Sergio Belkin wrote:
How does this (https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/)
affect Fedora?
I think Fedora now needs some kind of LTS.
At least I was planning to support CentOS via EPEL as
a kind of
On 09.12.20 11:17, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> However, since CentOS Linux 8 (and 9!) will be no more, do we have some
> ideas how to handle this? Do we require all EPEL contributors to obtain
> the developer RHEL subscription (seems like a huge pain)? Do we switch
> to Oracle Linux (only half joking)?
Hello!
On 09.12.20 04:26, Sergio Belkin wrote:
How does this (https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/)
affect Fedora?
I think Fedora now needs some kind of LTS.
At least I was planning to support CentOS via EPEL as
a kind of "Fedora LTS".
Best Regards
Christoph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905896
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905544
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Marius Schwarz wrote:
> it will eat disk space. If you have 0ad laying around in 3 different
> version, that's 1 GB each.
Sure, but that is usually not the scarce resource. And if you need the disk
space, you can always clear the cache manually. Deleting data should not be
the default action.
Hello,
wrt https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/
Since EPEL 8 is for RHEL 8 and EPEL Next 8 is for CentOS Stream 8, I assumed we
will continue to use CentOS Linux 8 for local mock (and Copr) builds of EPEL 8
packages. The same for EPEL 9.
However, since CentOS Linux 8
Am 09.12.20 um 00:34 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel:
Vít Ondruch wrote:
As a workaround, if you use `keepcache=True` in dnf.conf, you'd have
copies of everything you previously installed on your system.
I still don't understand why this is not the default. Even for stable
releases, because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905896
Bug ID: 1905896
Summary: perl-libnet-3.12 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-libnet
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
I think the official answer to your question is "nothing: Fedora will continue
to provide the development distro upon Centos Stream and then RHEL are built".
My opinion instead is that we have many valuable contributors that are in the
Fedora community because they have CentOS/RHEL servers in
Hello, Michal.
Sorry for replying publicly, but I haven't gotten a reply from you to my
direct e-mails since February. I sent a follow-up in August, but you
haven't replied to that one, either.
If you're no longer the contact person for the Open Power Hub, then do
you know who it is now? Or is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905544
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
On Tue Dec 8, 2020 at 8:17 PM CET, Dan Čermák wrote:
> Hi Robin,
Hi Dan,
> BuildRequires: golang($url/$owner/$pkg)
> indicates a dependent package that must be available in Fedora. It is
> actually not a macro, it's just a naming convention for golang packages
> (more specifically, this is a
100 matches
Mail list logo
