On Thursday, November 4, 2021 2:07:53 AM CET Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 09:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > and that its
> > >
> > > subject nor the body contained any information besides the (currently
> > > valid) URL to some JSON data.
> >
> > I don't recall exactly
Sounds interesting. Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017154
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX-0.16- |perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX-0.16-
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 3:44 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:41:59PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > ocaml-charinfo-width orphan 2 weeks
> > ago
> > ocaml-cmdlinerorphan 2 weeks
> > ago
Look at your first screen shot. When discs have data or other OSs on them,
Anaconda tries to not disturb existing data. You must select “make additional
space available” before the installer can progress. Anaconda is not like other
installers. Often, users from the Debian world have trouble
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017154
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX-0.16- |perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX-0.16-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017154
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX-0.16- |perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX-0.16-
On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 09:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > and that its
> > subject nor the body contained any information besides the (currently
> > valid)
> > URL to some JSON data.
>
> I don't recall exactly how this part works, but it's *probably* because
> this is broken:
>
>
On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 09:38:57AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
...snip...
>
> I'll send a patch to fix that. Of course, what we're *really* behind on
> here is getting datagrepper and FMN rewritten to use fedora-messaging
> and message schemas[0] instead of fedmsg and the fedmsg_meta stuff...
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017154
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX-0.16- |perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX-0.16-
Greetings everyone.
I've disabled editing of our mediawiki "iDiscussion/Talk" pages.
The idea is that people can use those talk pages to discuss
or ask questions about a page. However, while people do add
questions or ideas to these pages, very rarely will anyone respond to
them or see their
Greetings everyone.
I've disabled editing of our mediawiki "iDiscussion/Talk" pages.
The idea is that people can use those talk pages to discuss
or ask questions about a page. However, while people do add
questions or ideas to these pages, very rarely will anyone respond to
them or see their
Am Mittwoch, dem 03.11.2021 um 20:10 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82'
Esser:
> Hi,
>
> jsoncpp 1.9.5 has just been released and it bumps its library soname
> from 24 to 25. The following packages are affected:
>
> * cmake
> * domoticz
> * guayadeque
> * libopenshot
> * minetest
> * notekit
> *
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020025
Bug ID: 2020025
Summary: perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX-0.17 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Spreadsheet-XLSX
Keywords: FutureFeature,
Would you like to have this meeting uploaded to Fedora Project's YouTube
channel?
Br,
Eduard Lucena
El mié., 3 de noviembre de 2021 18:34, Dusty Mabe
escribió:
>
>
> On 11/2/21 10:19 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Tomorrow we will be holding a video meeting for the Fedora CoreOS
>
On 11/2/21 10:19 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Tomorrow we will be holding a video meeting for the Fedora CoreOS community.
>
> Colin Walters will be presenting on a new proposal for "CoreOS Layering".
> https://github.com/coreos/enhancements/pull/7
>
> We'll also be discussing any
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 11:03 AM Jun Aruga wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 10:33 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-10-25 01:21, Jun Aruga wrote:
> > > I might find the issues about installation with the Fedora 35 64-bit
> > > network install image. How and where can I report it?
> > > Is
Hi,
jsoncpp 1.9.5 has just been released and it bumps its library soname
from 24 to 25. The following packages are affected:
* cmake
* domoticz
* guayadeque
* libopenshot
* minetest
* notekit
* oomd
* openxr
* paraview
* pcl
* polybar
* qpid-proton
* raceintospace
* radiotray-ng
* torque
*
On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 14:26 -0400, Ben Beasley wrote:
> I don’t know where to find documentation for operator precedence in
> RPM
> conditional expressions, but it looks like “!” binds more tightly
> than
> “>=”, so
>
> > %if ! 0%{?rhel} >= 8
>
> is grouped as
>
> > %if (! 0%{?rhel}) >= 8
>
I don’t know where to find documentation for operator precedence in RPM
conditional expressions, but it looks like “!” binds more tightly than
“>=”, so
> %if ! 0%{?rhel} >= 8
is grouped as
> %if (! 0%{?rhel}) >= 8
which becomes, on Fedora:
> %if (! 00) >= 8
> %if 1 >= 8
and therefore
Hi,
I just notice build in mock or koji this scriptlet [1] on a build for
Fedora gives me "is rhel 8 or 9" , what I'm missing ?
Thank you
[1]
%if ! 0%{?rhel} >= 8
echo "is not rhel >= 8"
%else
echo "is rhel 8 or 9"
%endif
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
On 2021-11-10, or slightly later, I will build c4core 0.1.7 in Rawhide.
This includes an soname bump.
This notice is just a formality since c4core was introduced in order to
package rapidyaml in the future, and no packages yet depend on it.
___
On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 01:31:50PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 10:00:05 AM EDT David Sastre wrote:
> > I assume that the people who worked on it looked into various different
> > possibilities for its implementation and decide on the current one, but I
>
Hello,
On Wednesday, November 3, 2021 10:00:05 AM EDT David Sastre wrote:
> I assume that the people who worked on it looked into various different
> possibilities for its implementation and decide on the current one, but I
> have a few questions:
>
>- Since there are people concerned about
On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 23:43 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote on 2021/11/03 0:59:
> > Please build your packages for F35 in f35-build-side-47231
> >
> > or maybe we should request help of an proven packager
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 2021-10-31 at 22:02 +,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1972092
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 08:54 +0100, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 6:32:34 PM CET Adam Williamson wrote:
> > 4. The email notifications should be customizable via
> > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/ , I believe. I do agree
> > it would be good if we could tweak some
I would like to ping srakitnican, the Timeshift maintainer (someone is
in touch with them?).
Timeshift is a graphical tool to manage BTRFS snapshots. I don't use it
personally, but I know a bunch of people that rely on it.
Thimeshift coming from the Fedora repository, doesn't work on Fedora
On Mi, 03.11.21 15:00, David Sastre (d.sastre.med...@gmail.com) wrote:
>- There are a few existing formats for software identification and SBOMs:
> - SPDX[2], used in the example spec in the proposal
> - SWID tags[3][4]
> - OWASP CycloneDX[5]
> - CPE[6], used in the
Sérgio Basto wrote on 2021/11/03 0:59:
Please build your packages for F35 in f35-build-side-47231
or maybe we should request help of an proven packager
Thank you
On Sun, 2021-10-31 at 22:02 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sun, 2021-10-31 at 22:56 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Sun, Oct
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 6/206 (x86_64), 6/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211101.n.0):
ID: 1050204 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server
URL:
This is an interesting proposal and discussion.
I assume that the people who worked on it looked into various different
possibilities for its implementation and decide on the current one, but I
have a few questions:
- Since there are people concerned about the increased size of the
binary,
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:47 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 11:15, Konrad Kleine wrote:
>>
>> Dear Fedora packagers, developers and users,
>>
>> we have some good news for you:
>>
>> We are beginning to build nightly snapshot packages of LLVM for the latest
>> versions of
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 11:15, Konrad Kleine wrote:
> Dear Fedora packagers, developers and users,
>
> we have some good news for you:
>
> We are beginning to build nightly snapshot packages of LLVM for the latest
> versions of Fedora Linux (currently 34, 35 and rawhide) for a growing list
> of
>
Hi,
this is the season: we have the chance to update questions for the interviews.
Any stuff that you think the candidates should answer in particular?
If there is no input, I expect that the questions will be unchanged
(see below). This might not be a bad thing, because they are
open-ended and
Sorry everyone, I wanted to send a private email :(
--
Tomasz Torcz 72->| 80->|
to...@pipebreaker.pl 72->| 80->|
___
devel mailing list --
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 02:33:19PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Wednesday, 13 October 2021 at 13:08, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> > You had to register at a website during the event,
>
> That I did. On August 7th, I received an e-mail with a promo code to
> enter at
Now through 17 November, you may nominate candidates for the open seat on
the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
To nominate yourself (or others, if you check with them first), visit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations
FESCo is currently selecting the
Now through 17 November, you may nominate candidates for the open seat on
the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
To nominate yourself (or others, if you check with them first), visit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations
FESCo is currently selecting the
> I already announced another protobuf 3.19.0 update and rebuild and on
> top of it there is PR open to enable the Java bindings again:
Great, thanks.
Zuzana.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 36 Rawhide 20211103.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 03:11:00PM +0100, Zuzana Miklankova wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply, but I noticed this change only when the rebuild
> of mysql-connector-java failed.
>
> > Because of missing dependencies we had to disable the Java bindings
> > which breaks the build of:
>
>
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:41 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> V Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 01:45:00AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> > Dne 25. 10. 21 v 21:09 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> > > === Why not just use the rpm database? ===
> > >
> > >
> > > 17:34:33 The main reason for this appears to be that we
> >
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211102.0):
ID: 1050014 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:41:59PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> ocaml-charinfo-width orphan 2 weeks ago
> ocaml-cmdlinerorphan 2 weeks ago
> ocaml-cudforphan 2
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:07 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> For wide hearing/reading, before final announcement,
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java17 have anybody any opinion or
> anything to say for/against?
I am for this change. Fedora should use the latest OpenJDK by
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20211102.0):
ID: 1049998 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 19:35 +, Maíra Canal via devel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm an undergrad student of Computer Engineering in Brazil. I use
> Fedora for about a year as my only OS and I love the philosophy (and
> the performance) of Fedora. Currently, I'm looking forward to being a
> part of
On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 09:39:28AM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > Devil advocate here:
> >
> > **Some** people wipe `/var/lib/rpm` to save 5.9 MB. And because of this we
> > will put another 5.9 MB [citation needed] as metadata split across various
> > ELF objects for **everybody**.
This was
V Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 01:45:00AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> Dne 25. 10. 21 v 21:09 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> > === Why not just use the rpm database? ===
> >
> >
> > 17:34:33 The main reason for this appears to be that we
> > need the RPM db locally to resolve build-ids to package names.
Le 31/10/2021 à 22:44, Luya Tshimbalanga a écrit :
Hello team,
ImageMagick is updated 6.9.12.28 on Rawhide and got side tag as
35-build-side-47231. For my understanding, the following packages
(including those from RPM Fusion) may need a rebuild based on these
dependencies:
fedora
Thank you :).
> Please consider joining java-devel mailing list [1] used for
> Java-related packaging topics.
Thanks for pointing it out, I have just subscribed to this mailing list.
Zuzana.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 6:32:34 PM CET Adam Williamson wrote:
> 4. The email notifications should be customizable via
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/ , I believe. I do agree
> it would be good if we could tweak some defaults in the notification
> code to not notify you when
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 07:35:24PM -, Maíra Canal via devel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm an undergrad student of Computer Engineering in Brazil. I use Fedora for
> about a year as my only OS and I love the philosophy (and the performance) of
> Fedora. Currently, I'm looking forward to being a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2019407
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Sys-Virt-7.9.0-1.fc36
On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 8:30:15 PM CET Adam Williamson wrote:
> Further to this: I did re-run the tests, they did pass, it did make
> Bodhi happy, and I successfully submitted the update to stable. It
> should get pushed in the next push, I hope.
>
> It looks like what happened is that Bodhi
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20211102.0):
ID: 1049866 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
57 matches
Mail list logo
