Dave AA6YQ wrote:
I'm going to start driving my car around at 150 mph. When some
programmer develops an an add-in that reads speed limit signs and
prevents me from going too fast, I'll stop running into other cars
and people.
Any criticism I receive between now and then from victims or
Yes, that can happen to transmitters in general, on any mode. But, as long
as an operator is sitting there doing the control of the transmission, he is
capable of immediately knowing what is happening. For instance: I come up
on a freq, in SSB, and listen. Hearing nothing, I ask twice if the
Jack, I think I answered most of that just now, to another station.
As long as you are setting there, and have checked that the freq is clear,
fire away. If then you get someone coming in and connecting, you have
already checked the frequency, so go ahead with your contact. But, if he
hears you,
At 01:07 AM 1/18/2008, Danny wrote:
See interspaced comments.
Jack, I think I answered most of that just now, to another station.
As long as you are setting there, and have checked that the freq is clear,
fire away. If then you get someone coming in and connecting, you have
already checked
Pretty confusing indeed.
As Jack says, you never know when someone will connect.
Have any of the proponents been a sysop? I guess they have not.
TIS
Software would have to be rewritten, so an incoming call rings a bell,
turns on a lamp, awakens the dogs and let'em out,
something that lets
.
73,
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:16 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: I, am a Pactor Robot
Hello John,
Well I have seen no others, aside from you
PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 7:55 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: I, am a Pactor Robot
Hello Howard,
I was actually agreeing with John; sorry to all if it was poorly
worded. When operating Pactor (and in the past using Amtor), I too
will
be disregarded as pot-stirring.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jose Amador
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 4:06 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: I, am a Pactor Robot
Jack. We on the other side see THAT as exactly the problem. Your mailbox
sits there silent. Somone else gets on the freq and calls it. It comes
up - and causes interference to someone else that is already using the freq
(which you would have heard if you were physically sitting there
Hello John,
Well I have seen no others, aside from you, complaining about qrm when
operating Pactor modes on the sole basis that you were using Pactor.
I am sure it happens as we all get benign qrm. As I have posted often,
it is sad some think Pactor modes are the issue when it is the Winlink
No Bill and you will not see others on this list.
99.5% are sound card *ONLY* operators and have no clue
what the non sound cards modes are all about. Other then what
they have read, such as it's all bad and that is why pactor has
such a bad name. Not all of us pactor operators are robots stations
.
Just my $ .02 worth which will not buy you even a plain
donut hole.
Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN
- Original Message -
From: Bill McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:16 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: I, am a Pactor Robot
.
Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN
- Original Message -
From: Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:14 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: I, am a Pactor Robot
Jack. We on the other side see THAT as exactly the problem
At 01:14 PM 1/17/2008, Danny wrote:
Jack. We on the other side see THAT as exactly the problem. Your mailbox
sits there silent. Somone else gets on the freq and calls it. It comes
up - and causes interference to someone else that is already using the freq
(which you would have heard if you were
14 matches
Mail list logo
